Not evaluated
AlphaEvolve: complex 4×4 matrices in 48 multiplications
Kissing number 593 in dimension 11; more than 50 open problems (about 75 % matched, 20 % improved)
The gist
Google DeepMind presented AlphaEvolve on May 14, 2025: 4×4 complex matrices multiplied in 48 multiplications, a kissing number of 593 in dimension 11, and more than 50 open problems (about 75 % matched, 20 % improved); no DiscoverIA status yet.
DiscoverIA status on October 11, 2026: not evaluated, meaning no third-party evaluation found.
AI draft, not reviewedWhat has not been reviewed?
Text written by an AI (DiscoverIA pipeline), on . The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
Cite this entry
A single status snapshot since Oct 11, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot.
Cite snapshot 1, Oct 11, 2026
APA citation with the dated link
BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-alphaevolve-2025-05-14-r1
@misc{discoveria-alphaevolve-2025-05-14-r1,
author = {{DiscoverIA}},
title = {AlphaEvolve: complex 4×4 matrices in 48 multiplications; kissing number 593 in dimension 11; more than 50 open problems (about 75 % matched, 20 % improved)},
howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry alphaevolve-2025-05-14},
note = {Status “Not evaluated”, snapshot 1, recorded on October 11, 2026. New result},
year = {2026},
url = {https://discoveria.ai/entry/alphaevolve-2025-05-14#releve-1},
urldate = {2026-10-11}
}Dated link opens this snapshot in the history
To understand ≈ 20 s reading time, estimated
What it changes
If the results hold, they would show that a coding agent powered by Gemini can match most of the best known results on open problems in mathematics and algorithms, and improve some of them. Announced examples include 4×4 complex matrices multiplied in 48 multiplications and a kissing number of 593 in dimension 11.
What remains unclear
The code and constructions are published, but no verifier is named: nothing has been checked by a third party. The proportions (about 75 % matched, 20 % improved) come from DeepMind's own announcement, which is the only source read.
In the glossary : Record, Kissing number
For experts
Sources, method, key facts, status history, report an error
Status
Not evaluated
Recorded on · deepmind.google
Step 1 of 4 on the scale: not evaluated. Next step: under review.
- Announced
- Recordednot evaluated
- nextTo follow
What this status means
Source reading : Source read through an AI summary (level 2 of 3)
The result is declared neither right nor wrong.
To move to “Under review”: a public review under way. To “Peer reviewed”: a journal publication or a review by named experts.
Sources
- Main sourcedeepmind.googlepage read through an AI summary
Method
DiscoverIA status: not evaluated, meaning that no third-party evaluation has been found in the sources read. Set on October 11, 2026 from deepmind.google (page read through a model summary, quotation not rechecked).
Limits
The status source was read through a model summary; its quotation was not rechecked. DiscoverIA has not checked this result itself.
Key facts
- Claimed by
- Google DeepMind
announced on May 14, 2025 - Nature
- new result
- Field
- Mathematics (algorithms / combinatorics / geometry)
- Checked by
- no verifier identified
- Sources
- 1 : 1 through an AI summary
- This entry
- AI draft, not reviewed
Status history
Only one observation so far.
An observation is added; none is ever erased.
Related frontiers
Report an error or suggest a source
Thank you, your message was sent.
Sending failed. Try again, or write to contact@discoveria.ai.
Is your result listed?What each status requires, correcting this entry, replying to it.