The gist
Google DeepMind announced on January 17, 2024 that AlphaGeometry solves 25 of 30 geometry problems from the IMO (a maths competition). Status: peer reviewed.
DiscoverIA status on October 11, 2026: peer reviewed, meaning published in a journal or reviewed by named experts.
AI draft, not reviewedWhat has not been reviewed?
Text written by an AI (DiscoverIA pipeline), on . The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
Cite this entry
A single status snapshot since Oct 11, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot.
Cite snapshot 1, Oct 11, 2026
APA citation with the dated link
BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-alphageometry-2024-01-17-r1
@misc{discoveria-alphageometry-2024-01-17-r1,
author = {{DiscoverIA}},
title = {AlphaGeometry: 25 of 30 IMO geometry problems},
howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry alphageometry-2024-01-17},
note = {Status “Peer reviewed”, snapshot 1, recorded on October 11, 2026. Competition},
year = {2026},
url = {https://discoveria.ai/entry/alphageometry-2024-01-17#releve-1},
urldate = {2026-10-11}
}Dated link opens this snapshot in the history
To understand ≈ 20 s reading time, estimated
What it changes
If the result holds, a program could handle a large share of the geometry problems of a demanding competition. This field requires proofs, not just a final answer.
What remains unclear
The Nature article page was opened (“Peer review” section present), but the “25 of 30” result was not checked in the article itself. No third-party verifier is named.
For experts
Sources, method, key facts, status history, report an error
Status
Peer reviewed
Recorded on · nature.com
Step 3 of 4 on the scale: peer reviewed. Next step: formally verified.
- Announced
- Recordedpeer reviewed
What this status means
Source reading : Source read word for word (level 3 of 3)
Published in a journal or reviewed by named experts.
Sources
- Main sourcenature.compage read word for word · consulted on Oct 20, 2026 ·
Solving olympiad geometry without human demonstrations
- Corroborationscientificamerican.comlink only, reading not recorded
Method
DiscoverIA status: peer reviewed (published in a journal or reviewed by named experts). Set on October 11, 2026; source read on October 20, 2026 from nature.com (page read, quotation checked word for word: “Solving olympiad geometry without human demonstrations”).
Limits
The status may change if a new source is published; the dated history stays visible.
Key facts
- Claimed by
- Google DeepMind
announced on Jan 17, 2024 - Nature
- competition
- Field
- Mathematics (geometry / proof)
- Checked by
- peer review by the journal Nature (“Peer review” section present)
- Sources
- 2 : 1 read word for word, 1 link only
- This entry
- AI draft, not reviewed
Status history
Only one observation so far.
- 01
First observation:Peer reviewedCurrent status
Nature vol. 625, no. 7995, p. 476; received April 30, 2023, accepted October 13, 2023, published January 17, 2024; “Peer review” section present.
Source: nature.comread word for word
An observation is added; none is ever erased.
Report an error or suggest a source
Thank you, your message was sent.
Sending failed. Try again, or write to contact@discoveria.ai.
Is your result listed?What each status requires, correcting this entry, replying to it.