Skip to content
SearchFR · Français
Get started
Registry

Withdrawn

AI claims on 11 Erdős problems classed as incorrect by the wiki

AI claims on 11 Erdős problems classed as incorrect by the Erdős AI wiki

The gist

The wiki of AI contributions to Erdős problems classes claims on 11 problems as incorrect, from January to May 2026.

DiscoverIA status on October 18, 2026: withdrawn, meaning withdrawn or abandoned by its author, or marked incorrect by the reference source.

Status detailsDetails

Text written by an AI, reviewed by Antoine Olivier,

FollowReport

Cite this entry

The status has changed 1 times since Oct 11, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot. Cite an earlier snapshot

Cite snapshot 2, Oct 18, 2026

APA citation with the dated link

DiscoverIA. (2026, October 18). AI claims on 11 Erdős problems classed as incorrect by the Erdős AI wiki [Status: Withdrawn, snapshot 2]. DiscoverIA registry. https://discoveria.ai/entry/erdos-wiki-incorrect-claims#releve-2

BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-erdos-wiki-incorrect-claims-r2

@misc{discoveria-erdos-wiki-incorrect-claims-r2,
  author       = {{DiscoverIA}},
  title        = {AI claims on 11 Erdős problems classed as incorrect by the Erdős AI wiki},
  howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry erdos-wiki-incorrect-claims},
  note         = {Status “Withdrawn”, snapshot 2, recorded on October 18, 2026. New result},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://discoveria.ai/entry/erdos-wiki-incorrect-claims#releve-2},
  urldate      = {2026-10-18}
}

Dated link opens this snapshot in the history

https://discoveria.ai/entry/erdos-wiki-incorrect-claims#releve-2

To understand ≈ 20 s reading time, estimated

What it changes

This batch keeps a record of the claims the wiki judges wrong: an incorrect proof, an incorrect conditional proof or an incorrect claim. It gives a fuller picture of AI results on these problems, failures included.

What remains unclear

The sources read do not detail, problem by problem, which error was found. The wiki has not been updated since June 30, 2026.

In the glossary : Hallucination

For experts

Sources, method, key facts, status history, report an error

Status

Withdrawn

Recorded on · github.com

Outside the verification path

  1. Announced
  2. Recordedcontested
  3. Revisedwithdrawn
What this status means

Source reading : Source read word for word (level 3 of 3)

Withdrawn or abandoned by its author, or marked incorrect by the reference source.

Full history

Proofs
lignes rouges du wiki : « Incorrect proof found », « Incorrect (conditional) proof found », « Incorrect claim made »

Sources

Method

The batch gathers the wiki's red rows for problems 7, 11, 51, 233, 388, 411, 616, 647, 848, 888 and 1044: “Incorrect proof found” for most, “Incorrect claim made” for 11 and 1044, “Incorrect (conditional) proof found” for 233. The rows run from January 5 to May 2, 2026; those for 7, 388, 411 and 848 come from human contributions with AI. Status “withdrawn” recorded on October 18, 2026 from github.com (page read, quotation checked word for word). History: 2 dated observations, oldest first.

Limits

The status may change if a new source is published; the dated history stays visible.

Key facts

Claimed by
Not shown (withdrawn entry)
announced on Jan 2026
Nature
new result
Field
Mathematics
Checked by
wiki maintainers
Sources
1 : 1 read word for word
This entry
Reviewed by Antoine Olivier, Oct 18, 2026

Status history

Most recent first; each observation is numbered in the order it was recorded.

  1. 02

    ContestedbecomesWithdrawnCurrent status

    batch split: the rows the wiki marks incorrect become withdrawn; the “Argument with major gaps made” rows and the partial case of problem #1040 move to a separate record…

    Read the full reason

    batch split: the rows the wiki marks incorrect become withdrawn; the “Argument with major gaps made” rows and the partial case of problem #1040 move to a separate record (contested)

    Source: github.comread word for word

  2. 01

    First observation:Contested

    the wiki marks them “incorrect” (withdrawn in practice)

    Source: github.comread word for word

An observation is added; none is ever erased.

Cite an earlier snapshot

These snapshots no longer give the current status. Cite them only to date a past state.

Cite snapshot 1, Oct 11, 2026

Contested status superseded on Oct 18, 2026

the wiki marks them “incorrect” (withdrawn in practice)

APA citation with the dated link

DiscoverIA. (2026, October 11). AI claims on 11 Erdős problems classed as incorrect by the Erdős AI wiki [Status: Contested, snapshot 1]. DiscoverIA registry. https://discoveria.ai/entry/erdos-wiki-incorrect-claims#releve-1

BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-erdos-wiki-incorrect-claims-r1

@misc{discoveria-erdos-wiki-incorrect-claims-r1,
  author       = {{DiscoverIA}},
  title        = {AI claims on 11 Erdős problems classed as incorrect by the Erdős AI wiki},
  howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry erdos-wiki-incorrect-claims},
  note         = {Status “Contested”, snapshot 1, recorded on October 11, 2026. New result},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://discoveria.ai/entry/erdos-wiki-incorrect-claims#releve-1},
  urldate      = {2026-10-11}
}

Dated link opens this snapshot in the history

https://discoveria.ai/entry/erdos-wiki-incorrect-claims#releve-1

Report an error or suggest a source

How DiscoverIA uses your address and how to exercise your rights: privacy policy.

Is your result listed?What each status requires, correcting this entry, replying to it.