Non-zero single-minus gluon tree amplitudes: formula proposed by GPT-5.2 Pro
Status
Not evaluated
Recorded on · openai.com
- Announced
- Recordednot evaluated
- nextTo follow
What this status means
Source reading : Source read word for word (level 3 of 3)
No DiscoverIA status yet; this does not mean nobody has checked it.
To move to “Under review”: a public review under way. To “Peer reviewed”: a journal publication or a review by named experts.
The gist
OpenAI and researchers from IAS, Vanderbilt, Cambridge and Harvard announced on 13 February 2026 a theoretical physics formula proposed by GPT-5.2 Pro. Status: not yet assessed.
Cite this entry
A single status snapshot since Oct 11, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot.
Cite snapshot 1, Oct 11, 2026
APA citation with the dated link
BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-gpt52-gluon-amplitudes-2026-02-13-r1
@misc{discoveria-gpt52-gluon-amplitudes-2026-02-13-r1,
author = {{DiscoverIA}},
title = {Non-zero single-minus gluon tree amplitudes: formula proposed by GPT-5.2 Pro},
howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry gpt52-gluon-amplitudes-2026-02-13},
note = {Status « Not evaluated », snapshot 1, recorded on October 11, 2026. new result},
year = {2026},
url = {https://discoveria.ai/en/fiche/gpt52-gluon-amplitudes-2026-02-13/#releve-1},
urldate = {2026-10-11}
}Dated link opens this snapshot in the history
Text written by an AI (DiscoverIA pipeline), on Reviewed by: nobody yetReport an error
What has not been reviewed?
The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
Key facts
- Claimed by
- OpenAI avec IAS, Vanderbilt, Cambridge, Harvard
announced on Feb 13, 2026 - Nature
- new result
- Field
- Physics (theoretical physics)
- Checked by
- the authors (including OpenAI affiliates); no third party found
- Sources (domains)
- 1 : 1 links only
- This entry
- AI draft, not reviewed
To understand
Analogy
It is like guessing the general rule hidden behind a series of special cases: you propose a formula, and then you still have to prove it holds in every case.
What it changes
Gluons are the particles that carry the strong force, and an amplitude is used to compute the likelihood of an interaction. If the result holds, an AI would have suggested a formula for amplitudes shown to be non-zero, and an internal model would then have supplied the proof.
What remains unclear
The proof was verified by the authors, some of them affiliated with OpenAI; no third party was found. The identifier of the arXiv preprint was not recorded.
1 source.
For experts
Sources(domains)
- primaireopenai.comlink only, reading not recorded
Method
Status “not evaluated” recorded on 11 October 2026 from openai.com (page read, quotation checked word for word).
Limits
DiscoverIA has recorded no independent evaluation as of this date.
It is like guessing the general rule hidden behind a series of special cases: you propose a formula, and then you still have to prove it holds in every case.
Status history
Only one observation so far.
An observation is added; none is ever erased.
Report an error or suggest a source
Thank you, your message was sent.
Sending failed. Try again, or write to [email protected].