Skip to content
SearchFR · Français
Get started
Registry

Not evaluated

A quasi-Riemann hypothesis for Dedekind zeta functions (Cureton and Thorner, with AxiomProver)

The gist

Dean Cureton and Jesse Thorner posted on Hexagon, on October 12, 2026, a proof obtained with the AxiomProver system that no Dedekind zeta function would vanish when the real part exceeds 31/32 (version of October 14).

DiscoverIA status on October 24, 2026: not evaluated, meaning no third-party evaluation found.

Status detailsDetails

AI draft, not reviewedWhat has not been reviewed?

Text written by an AI (DiscoverIA pipeline), on . The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.

FollowReport

Cite this entry

A single status snapshot since Oct 24, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot.

Cite snapshot 1, Oct 24, 2026

APA citation with the dated link

DiscoverIA. (2026, October 24). A quasi-Riemann hypothesis for Dedekind zeta functions (Cureton and Thorner, with AxiomProver) [Status: Not evaluated, snapshot 1]. DiscoverIA registry. https://discoveria.ai/entry/cureton-thorner-qrh-dedekind-2026-10-12#releve-1

BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-cureton-thorner-qrh-dedekind-2026-10-12-r1

@misc{discoveria-cureton-thorner-qrh-dedekind-2026-10-12-r1,
  author       = {{DiscoverIA}},
  title        = {A quasi-Riemann hypothesis for Dedekind zeta functions (Cureton and Thorner, with AxiomProver)},
  howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry cureton-thorner-qrh-dedekind-2026-10-12},
  note         = {Status “Not evaluated”, snapshot 1, recorded on October 24, 2026. New result},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://discoveria.ai/entry/cureton-thorner-qrh-dedekind-2026-10-12#releve-1},
  urldate      = {2026-10-24}
}

Dated link opens this snapshot in the history

https://discoveria.ai/entry/cureton-thorner-qrh-dedekind-2026-10-12#releve-1

To understand ≈ 30 s reading time, estimated

What it changes

Dedekind zeta functions extend the Riemann zeta function to number fields. If the result held, none of them would have a zero in the half-plane where the real part exceeds 31/32, a weakened form of the Riemann hypothesis known as a quasi-Riemann hypothesis. The work follows the strategy of an OpenAI preprint on Artin's conjecture, which obtained a narrower region of this kind for certain Hecke L-functions and for the zeta functions of certain fields; OpenAI had also announced the bounds 7/8 and 11/12 for Dirichlet L-functions, including the Riemann zeta function.

What remains unclear

Hexagon does not carry out peer review, and no third party has checked the proof yet: Iwao Kimura cites it while stating that he has not checked it. The Lean formalisation comes from the authors.

For experts

Sources, method, key facts, status history, report an error

Status

Not evaluated

Recorded on · hexagonmath.org · 2610.00200v2

Step 1 of 4 on the scale: not evaluated. Next step: under review.

  1. Announced
  2. Recordednot evaluated
  3. nextTo follow
What this status means

Source reading : Source read word for word (level 3 of 3)

The result is declared neither right nor wrong.

To move to “Under review”: a public review under way. To “Peer reviewed”: a journal publication or a review by named experts.

Full history

Proofs
œuvre Hexagon 2610.00200, PDF v1 et v2 lus, Lean (dépôt AxiomMath/DedekindZetaZeroFree, non rejoué ; fourni par les auteurs)

Sources

  • Main sourcehexagonmath.org · 2610.00200v2page read word for word · consulted on Oct 24, 2026 · If K is any number field, then ζ_K(s) ≠ 0 when Re s > 31/32 and s ≠ 1.
  • Paperhexagonmath.org · 2610.00200v1page read word for word · consulted on Oct 24, 2026 · If K is any number field, then ζ_K(s) ≠ 0 when Re s > 1 − 1/6000.
  • Lean proofgithub.compage read word for word · consulted on Oct 24, 2026 · AxiomProver generated the proofs and Lean formalization.
  • Corroborationarxiv.orgpage read word for word · consulted on Oct 24, 2026 · These preprints have not been refereed, and we have not checked their proofs

Method

Axiom Math's AxiomProver system generated the proofs and their Lean formalisation; the two researchers set the direction and take responsibility for the results. The first version, of October 12, gave the bound 1 − 1/6000, and the second, of October 14, widens the region to a width of 1/32; on Hexagon, the version 1 page nonetheless already shows 31/32. The formalisation is published in the AxiomMath/DedekindZetaZeroFree repository. DiscoverIA status: not evaluated, meaning that no third-party evaluation has been found in the sources read. Set on October 24, 2026 from hexagonmath.org (page read, quotation checked word for word: “If K is any number field, then ζ_K(s) ≠ 0 when Re s > 31/32 and s ≠ 1.”).

Limits

The claimant supplies a Lean proof; as of this date, DiscoverIA has found no independent verification of this proof or of the result.

Key facts

Claimed by
Dean Cureton et Jesse Thorner, with AxiomProver (Axiom Math)
announced on Oct 12, 2026
Nature
new result
Field
Mathematics (number theory / Dedekind zeta functions)
Checked by
no verifier identified
Sources
4 : 4 read word for word
This entry
AI draft, not reviewed

Status history

Only one observation so far.

  1. 01

    First observation:Not evaluatedCurrent status

    preprint on Hexagon, a platform without peer review; Lean supplied by the authors only; Iwao Kimura (arXiv 2610.21511v2, October 22) cites it without having checked it; no…

    Read the full reason

    preprint on Hexagon, a platform without peer review; Lean supplied by the authors only; Iwao Kimura (arXiv 2610.21511v2, October 22) cites it without having checked it; no third-party evaluation found

    Source: hexagonmath.orgread word for word

An observation is added; none is ever erased.

Report an error or suggest a source

How DiscoverIA uses your address and how to exercise your rights: privacy policy.

Is your result listed?What each status requires, correcting this entry, replying to it.