Withdrawn
Erdős problem #333: claimed proof judged incorrect by the wiki, literature proof not found (GPT-5.2 Pro)
The gist
The wiki of AI contributions to Erdős problems classes as incorrect a literature search by GPT-5.2 Pro on problem #333, dated December 25, 2025.
DiscoverIA status on October 12, 2026: withdrawn, meaning withdrawn or abandoned by its author, or marked incorrect by the reference source.
AI draft, not reviewedWhat has not been reviewed?
Text written by an AI (DiscoverIA pipeline), on . The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
Cite this entry
A single status snapshot since Oct 12, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot.
Cite snapshot 1, Oct 12, 2026
APA citation with the dated link
BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-erdos-333-gpt-5-2-pro-2a-r1
@misc{discoveria-erdos-333-gpt-5-2-pro-2a-r1,
author = {{DiscoverIA}},
title = {Erdős problem #333: claimed proof judged incorrect by the wiki, literature proof not found (GPT-5.2 Pro)},
howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry erdos-333-gpt-5-2-pro-2a},
note = {Status “Withdrawn”, snapshot 1, recorded on October 12, 2026. Literature search},
year = {2026},
url = {https://discoveria.ai/entry/erdos-333-gpt-5-2-pro-2a#releve-1},
urldate = {2026-10-12}
}Dated link opens this snapshot in the history
To understand ≈ 20 s reading time, estimated
What it changes
Problem #333 touches on additive bases (sets of integers such that every sufficiently large integer is a sum of a bounded number of their elements). The October 12, 2026 snapshot of erdosproblems.com lists the problem as disproved (informal_status=disproved), without saying whether this has any link with this attempt.
What remains unclear
The sources read do not specify the error found; the references consulted and the details of the search are not provided. The wiki has been frozen since June 30, 2026, so a correction published since then would not appear there.
For experts
Sources, method, key facts, status history, report an error
Status
Withdrawn
Recorded on · github.com · wiki
Outside the verification path
- Announced
- Wiki frozen
- Recordedwithdrawn
What this status means
Source reading : Source read word for word (level 3 of 3)
Withdrawn or abandoned by its author, or marked incorrect by the reference source.
Dated archive: status recorded on the wiki frozen on Jun 30, 2026
Sources
- Main sourcegithub.com · wikipage read word for word · consulted on Oct 12, 2026
- Reference listerdosproblems.comlink only, reading not recorded
- Corroborationterrytao.wordpress.compage read word for word · consulted on Oct 17, 2026 ·
We have created a github repository to coordinate this process
- Repositorygithub.com · CONTRIBUTING.mdpage read word for word · consulted on Oct 17, 2026 ·
this status is an unofficial crowdsourced classification of the problem
Method
Source: the “AI contributions to Erdős problems” wiki of the teorth/erdosproblems repository (a repository presented by Terence Tao in his blog post of August 31, 2025); frozen on June 30, 2026 (commit c8ad430, “freeze”) and read on October 12, 2026 in the git repository. Category 2(a), “Literature search” (secondary contribution). Humans named by the wiki: none; AI system: GPT-5.2 Pro. Date given by the wiki: December 25, 2025. Exact text: “Incorrect proof claimed; literature proof not found”; red flag (“incorrect work”, according to the wiki's legend). Literature cited by the wiki: none. Status of the problem in the teorth/erdosproblems community database (data/problems.yaml, unofficial classification, snapshot of October 12, 2026 with no commit identified, current state, not that of June 2026): disproved, answered in the negative (informal_status=disproved); a solution has been formalised in Lean (formal_status=Lean). This status concerns the problem, not this contribution. Problem page not read by DiscoverIA: https://www.erdosproblems.com/333. DiscoverIA status: withdrawn, because the wiki classes this contribution as incorrect (red flag). DiscoverIA has not checked this error itself. Recorded on October 12, 2026.
Limits
DiscoverIA has not checked this contribution itself.
Key facts
- Claimed by
- Not shown (withdrawn entry)
announced on Dec 25, 2025 - Nature
- literature search
- Field
- Mathematics (Erdős problem #333 (number theory ; additive basis))
- Wiki category
- Literature search (contribution secondaire : recherche bibliographique)
- Wiki verdict
- « Incorrect proof claimed; literature proof not found » : travail incorrect (légende du wiki)
- Checked by
- wiki maintainers (red flag)
- Sources
- 4 : 3 read word for word, 1 link only
- This entry
- AI draft, not reviewed
Status history
Only one observation so far.
- 01
First observation:WithdrawnCurrent status
marked incorrect by the wiki (red flag, “Incorrect work”)
Source: github.comread word for word
An observation is added; none is ever erased.
In the same set
AI contributions to Erdős problems (wiki by T. Tao, frozen on June 30, 2026) · entry 116 of 521, by problem number
- Not evaluated : Erdős problem #330: full solution according to the wiki (GPT-5.5 Pro)
- Not evaluated : Erdős problem #331: formalisation by Aristotle (proof: Ruzsa)
- Not evaluated : Erdős problem #333: full solution found in the literature according to the wiki (Aletheia)
- Withdrawn : Erdős problem #333: claimed proof judged incorrect by the wiki, literature proof not found (GPT-5.2 Pro)
- Not evaluated : Erdős problem #337: formalisation by Aristotle (proof: Ruzsa and Turjányi (1985))
- Not evaluated : Erdős problem #339: full solution found in the literature according to the wiki (GPT-5)
- Not evaluated : Erdős problem #342: partial result according to the wiki (GPT-5.2 Pro, GPT-5.4 Pro)
Report an error or suggest a source
Thank you, your message was sent.
Sending failed. Try again, or write to contact@discoveria.ai.
Is your result listed?What each status requires, correcting this entry, replying to it.