Not evaluated
Erdős problem #935: solution to one part of the problem according to the wiki (Aletheia)
The gist
According to the teorth/erdosproblems wiki on AI and Erdős problems, Aletheia reportedly obtained a solution to one part of Erdős problem #935, announced on February 1, 2026.
DiscoverIA status on October 12, 2026: not evaluated, meaning no third-party evaluation found.
AI draft, not reviewedWhat has not been reviewed?
Text written by an AI (DiscoverIA pipeline), on . The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
Cite this entry
A single status snapshot since Oct 12, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot.
Cite snapshot 1, Oct 12, 2026
APA citation with the dated link
BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-erdos-935-aletheia-1b-r1
@misc{discoveria-erdos-935-aletheia-1b-r1,
author = {{DiscoverIA}},
title = {Erdős problem #935: solution to one part of the problem according to the wiki (Aletheia)},
howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry erdos-935-aletheia-1b},
note = {Status “Not evaluated”, snapshot 1, recorded on October 12, 2026. New result},
year = {2026},
url = {https://discoveria.ai/entry/erdos-935-aletheia-1b#releve-1},
urldate = {2026-10-12}
}Dated link opens this snapshot in the history
To understand ≈ 20 s reading time, estimated
What it changes
Problem #935 belongs to number theory, around “powerful” numbers (an integer is called powerful when, for every prime that divides it, the square of that prime also divides it). If this result held, it would deal with only part of the problem. The wiki notes, however, an earlier comparable result, van Doorn (2025), found afterwards, on February 2, 2026, and marked as similar (“Yes”).
What remains unclear
The sources read do not say what the partial result covers or whether anyone has checked it. A verification published after the wiki's freeze would not appear there.
For experts
Sources, method, key facts, status history, report an error
Status
Not evaluated
Recorded on · github.com · wiki
Step 1 of 4 on the scale: not evaluated. Next step: under review.
- Announced
- Wiki frozen
- Recordednot evaluated
- nextTo follow
What this status means
Source reading : Source read word for word (level 3 of 3)
The result is declared neither right nor wrong.
To move to “Under review”: a public review under way. To “Peer reviewed”: a journal publication or a review by named experts.
Dated archive: status recorded on the wiki frozen on Jun 30, 2026
Sources
- Main sourcegithub.com · wikipage read word for word · consulted on Oct 12, 2026
- Reference listerdosproblems.comlink only, reading not recorded
- Corroborationterrytao.wordpress.compage read word for word · consulted on Oct 17, 2026 ·
We have created a github repository to coordinate this process
- Repositorygithub.com · CONTRIBUTING.mdpage read word for word · consulted on Oct 17, 2026 ·
this status is an unofficial crowdsourced classification of the problem
Method
Source: the “AI contributions to Erdős problems” wiki of the teorth/erdosproblems repository (a repository presented by Terence Tao in his blog post of August 31, 2025); frozen on June 30, 2026 (commit c8ad430, “freeze”) and read on October 12, 2026 in the git repository. Category 1(b), “AI alongside literature” (AI in parallel with the literature (a comparable result found afterwards); no significant human involvement). Humans named by the wiki: none; AI system: Aletheia. Date given by the wiki: February 1, 2026. Exact text: “Solution to one part of problem”; yellow flag (“partial progress”, according to the wiki's legend). Comparable literature found afterwards: van Doorn (2025) (solution to one part of [367]), on February 2, 2026; similar according to the wiki: “Yes”. Status of the problem in the teorth/erdosproblems community database (data/problems.yaml, unofficial classification, snapshot of October 12, 2026 with no commit identified, current state, not that of June 2026): open (informal_status=open); no formalised solution known (formal_status=unformalized). This status concerns the problem, not this contribution. Problem page not read by DiscoverIA: https://www.erdosproblems.com/935. DiscoverIA status: not evaluated (only the wiki's classification exists). Recorded on October 12, 2026.
Limits
DiscoverIA has not checked this contribution itself.
Key facts
- Claimed by
- Aletheia, according to the AI-Erdős wiki
announced on Feb 1, 2026 - Nature
- new result
- Field
- Mathematics (Erdős problem #935 (number theory ; powerful))
- Wiki category
- AI alongside literature (IA parallèle à la littérature (comparable découverte après coup)
- Wiki verdict
- « Solution to one part of problem » : 🟡 progrès partiel (légende du wiki)
- Checked by
- no verifier identified
- Sources
- 4 : 3 read word for word, 1 link only
- This entry
- AI draft, not reviewed
Status history
Only one observation so far.
An observation is added; none is ever erased.
In the same set
AI contributions to Erdős problems (wiki by T. Tao, frozen on June 30, 2026) · entry 375 of 521, by problem number
- Not evaluated : Erdős problem #923: formalisation by Aristotle (proof: Rödl (1977))
- Not evaluated : Erdős problem #927: formalisation by Aristotle (proof: Spencer (1971))
- Not evaluated : Erdős problem #931: partial result according to the wiki (Claude, GPT-5.4)
- Not evaluated : Erdős problem #935: solution to one part of the problem according to the wiki (Aletheia)
- Not evaluated : Erdős problem #942: partial result with a Lean proof according to the wiki (Aristotle, Claude Opus 4.8, Codex, GPT-5.5)
- Not evaluated : Erdős problem #942: partial results found in the literature according to the wiki (ChatGPT Deep research)
- Not evaluated : Erdős problem #942: new proof according to the wiki (Gemini)
Report an error or suggest a source
Thank you, your message was sent.
Sending failed. Try again, or write to contact@discoveria.ai.
Is your result listed?What each status requires, correcting this entry, replying to it.