Not evaluated
Toda's Gepner conjecture and large-volume stability (family 055)
The gist
In its release of October 6, 2026, OpenAI presents two manuscripts on Toda's Gepner conjecture, one on a stability condition on every smooth quintic threefold.
DiscoverIA status on October 12, 2026: not evaluated, meaning no third-party evaluation found.
AI draft, not reviewedWhat has not been reviewed?
Text written by an AI (DiscoverIA pipeline), on . The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
Cite this entry
A single status snapshot since Oct 12, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot.
Cite snapshot 1, Oct 12, 2026
APA citation with the dated link
BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-oai-fam-055-todas-gepner-conjecture-large-volume-r1
@misc{discoveria-oai-fam-055-todas-gepner-conjecture-large-volume-r1,
author = {{DiscoverIA}},
title = {Toda's Gepner conjecture and large-volume stability (family 055)},
howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry oai-fam-055-todas-gepner-conjecture-large-volume},
note = {Status “Not evaluated”, snapshot 1, recorded on October 12, 2026. New result},
year = {2026},
url = {https://discoveria.ai/entry/oai-fam-055-todas-gepner-conjecture-large-volume#releve-1},
urldate = {2026-10-12}
}Dated link opens this snapshot in the history
To understand ≈ 20 s reading time, estimated
What it changes
A smooth quintic threefold is a three-dimensional space defined by an equation of degree five, with no sharp points. If the manuscripts were correct, a Gepner stability condition would exist on each such space, and prescribed large-volume charges would be possible on threefolds with trivial canonical bundle.
What remains unclear
No Lean (a language in which a computer checks every step of a proof) is supplied for this family, and no third-party assessment is recorded.
For experts
Sources, method, key facts, status history, report an error
Status
Not evaluated
Recorded on · github.com · README.md
Step 1 of 4 on the scale: not evaluated. Next step: under review.
- Announced
- Recordednot evaluated
- nextTo follow
What this status means
Source reading : Source read word for word (level 3 of 3)
The result is declared neither right nor wrong.
To move to “Under review”: a public review under way. To “Peer reviewed”: a journal publication or a review by named experts.
Sources
- Main sourcegithub.com · CONTENTS.mdlink only, reading not recorded
- Repositorygithub.com · A-Gepner-stability…link only, reading not recorded
- Repositorygithub.com · Prescribed-large-volume…link only, reading not recorded
Method
Two manuscripts dated September 24, 2026, attributed to an unreleased internal OpenAI model: “A Gepner stability condition on every smooth quintic threefold” and “Prescribed large-volume charges on threefolds with trivial canonical bundle”. The repository contains no lean/docs/055.md file; its README states “Not all have accompanying Lean formalizations.”, and history.md reports no revision. DiscoverIA status: not evaluated, meaning that no third-party evaluation has been found in the sources read. Set on October 12, 2026 from github.com (page read, quotation checked word for word).
Limits
DiscoverIA has not checked this result itself.
Key facts
- Claimed by
- OpenAI (unreleased internal model)
announced on Oct 6, 2026 - Nature
- new result
- Field
- Mathematics (Algebraic and complex geometry)
- In openai/math
- family 055, section “Algebraic and complex geometry”, 2 manuscripts dated Sep 24, 2026
- Lean proof
- none supplied
- Revisions
- none reported by the claimant
- Checked by
- no verifier identified
- Sources
- 3 : 3 links only
- This entry
- AI draft, not reviewed
Status history
Only one observation so far.
- 01
First observation:Not evaluatedCurrent status
Family with no Lean proof supplied. No third-party evaluation read.
Source: github.comread word for word
An observation is added; none is ever erased.
In the same set
openai/math: 719 manuscripts in 372 families from an unreleased internal model · entry 54 of 372, by family number
- Not evaluated : Tangent-bundle splittings and universal covers (family 052)
- Not evaluated : A counterexample to Pixton's original completeness conjecture (family 053)
- Not evaluated : Counterexamples to Kuznetsov's rationality conjecture (family 054)
- Not evaluated : Toda's Gepner conjecture and large-volume stability (family 055)
- Not evaluated : Termination of fourfold minimal model programs (family 056)
- Not evaluated : Campana's abelianity conjecture and special varieties (family 057)
- Not evaluated : The Kollár–Pardon universal-cover conjecture (family 058)
Report an error or suggest a source
Thank you, your message was sent.
Sending failed. Try again, or write to contact@discoveria.ai.
Is your result listed?What each status requires, correcting this entry, replying to it.