Skip to content
SearchFR · Français
Get started

Not evaluated

A factor-two approximation for shortest common superstring (family 128)

The gist

In its release of October 6, 2026, OpenAI claims a polynomial-time algorithm that comes within a factor of two of the shortest string containing each of the given words.

DiscoverIA status on October 12, 2026: not evaluated, meaning no third-party evaluation found.

Status detailsDetails

AI draft, not reviewedWhat has not been reviewed?

Text written by an AI (DiscoverIA pipeline), on . The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.

FollowReport

Cite this entry

A single status snapshot since Oct 12, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot.

Cite snapshot 1, Oct 12, 2026

APA citation with the dated link

DiscoverIA. (2026, October 12). A factor-two approximation for shortest common superstring (family 128) [Status: Not evaluated, snapshot 1]. DiscoverIA registry. https://discoveria.ai/entry/oai-fam-128-factor-two-approximation-shortest-common#releve-1

BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-oai-fam-128-factor-two-approximation-shortest-common-r1

@misc{discoveria-oai-fam-128-factor-two-approximation-shortest-common-r1,
  author       = {{DiscoverIA}},
  title        = {A factor-two approximation for shortest common superstring (family 128)},
  howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry oai-fam-128-factor-two-approximation-shortest-common},
  note         = {Status “Not evaluated”, snapshot 1, recorded on October 12, 2026. New result},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://discoveria.ai/entry/oai-fam-128-factor-two-approximation-shortest-common#releve-1},
  urldate      = {2026-10-12}
}

Dated link opens this snapshot in the history

https://discoveria.ai/entry/oai-fam-128-factor-two-approximation-shortest-common#releve-1

To understand ≈ 20 s reading time, estimated

What it changes

If the manuscript held, an algorithm whose running time is bounded by a power of the input size would always return a string at most twice as long as the shortest possible one. A factor-two approximation is a guarantee, not an exact value: the string obtained may be longer than the best one.

What remains unclear

No independent assessment is recorded. The Lean (a language in which a computer checks every step of a proof) is supplied by OpenAI and marked “review: status: unchecked” in formalization.yaml.

For experts

Sources, method, key facts, status history, report an error

Status

Not evaluated

Recorded on · github.com · 128.md

Step 1 of 4 on the scale: not evaluated. Next step: under review.

  1. Announced
  2. Recordednot evaluated
  3. nextTo follow
What this status means

Source reading : Source read word for word (level 3 of 3)

The result is declared neither right nor wrong.

To move to “Under review”: a public review under way. To “Peer reviewed”: a journal publication or a review by named experts.

Full history

Proofs
manuscrit : A Polynomial-Time 2-Approximation for Shortest Common Superstring (preprints/A-Polynomial-Time-2-Approximation-for-Shortest-Common-Superstring-September-24-2026), Lean fourni par le revendicateur : lean/docs/128.md, 1 énoncé(s) Comparator (non vérifié par un tiers)

Sources

Method

OpenAI publishes one manuscript, “A Polynomial-Time 2-Approximation for Shortest Common Superstring”, dated September 24, 2026. The repository also holds lean/docs/128.md, which describes the scope of the Lean formalisation (1 Comparator statement), and lean/ComparatorChallenges/Superstring.lean. DiscoverIA status: not evaluated, meaning that no third-party evaluation has been found in the sources read. Set on October 12, 2026 from github.com (page read, quotation checked word for word: “describes the scope of the Lean formalization”).

Limits

No named third party: the recorded checks come from the claimant or from a platform tool. The claimant supplies a Lean proof; as of this date, DiscoverIA has found no independent verification of this proof or of the result.

Key facts

Claimed by
OpenAI (unreleased internal model)
announced on Oct 6, 2026
Nature
new result
Field
Theoretical computer science
In openai/math
family 128, section “Theoretical computer science”, 1 manuscript dated Sep 24, 2026
Lean proof
supplied by the claimant, marked “unchecked” (not reviewed) in its repository
Revisions
none reported by the claimant
Checked by
claimant (Lean supplied, not checked by a third party)
Sources
4 : 1 read word for word, 3 links only
This entry
AI draft, not reviewed

Status history

Only one observation so far.

  1. 01

    First observation:Not evaluatedCurrent status

    Family with a Lean proof supplied by the claimant. No third-party check read; the source marks this proof as not reviewed (“unchecked”).

    Source: github.comread word for word

An observation is added; none is ever erased.

In the same set

openai/math: 719 manuscripts in 372 families from an unreleased internal model · entry 124 of 372, by family number

See all 372 entries

Report an error or suggest a source

How DiscoverIA uses your address and how to exercise your rights: privacy policy.

Is your result listed?What each status requires, correcting this entry, replying to it.