Not evaluated
The blockwise Alperin weight conjecture (family 202)
The gist
On October 6, 2026, OpenAI announced, from an unreleased internal model, a manuscript dated September 23, 2026 on the blockwise Alperin weight conjecture.
DiscoverIA status on October 12, 2026: not evaluated, meaning no third-party evaluation found.
AI draft, not reviewedWhat has not been reviewed?
Text written by an AI (DiscoverIA pipeline), on . The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
Cite this entry
A single status snapshot since Oct 12, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot.
Cite snapshot 1, Oct 12, 2026
APA citation with the dated link
BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-oai-fam-202-blockwise-alperin-weight-conjecture-r1
@misc{discoveria-oai-fam-202-blockwise-alperin-weight-conjecture-r1,
author = {{DiscoverIA}},
title = {The blockwise Alperin weight conjecture (family 202)},
howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry oai-fam-202-blockwise-alperin-weight-conjecture},
note = {Status “Not evaluated”, snapshot 1, recorded on October 12, 2026. New result},
year = {2026},
url = {https://discoveria.ai/entry/oai-fam-202-blockwise-alperin-weight-conjecture#releve-1},
urldate = {2026-10-12}
}Dated link opens this snapshot in the history
To understand ≈ 20 s reading time, estimated
What it changes
If the manuscript were correct, it would bring a result on this conjecture, which OpenAI's repository files under the section “Algebra” of its overview (overview.tex).
What remains unclear
No Lean proof (Lean is a language in which a computer checks every step of a proof) is supplied for this family, and no third-party assessment is recorded. The sources read do not say whether the manuscript claims the whole conjecture or only part of it.
For experts
Sources, method, key facts, status history, report an error
Status
Not evaluated
Recorded on · github.com · README.md
Step 1 of 4 on the scale: not evaluated. Next step: under review.
- Announced
- Recordednot evaluated
- nextTo follow
What this status means
Source reading : Source read word for word (level 3 of 3)
The result is declared neither right nor wrong.
To move to “Under review”: a public review under way. To “Peer reviewed”: a journal publication or a review by named experts.
Sources
- Main sourcegithub.com · CONTENTS.mdlink only, reading not recorded
- Repositorygithub.com · The-Blockwise-Alperin…link only, reading not recorded
Method
The openai/math repository contains one manuscript, “The Blockwise Alperin Weight Conjecture”. The absence of Lean is read from the absence of lean/docs/202.md; the README states that not all manuscripts have a Lean formalisation. According to history.md, no revision is reported for this manuscript. DiscoverIA status: not evaluated, meaning that no third-party evaluation has been found in the sources read. Set on October 12, 2026 from github.com (page read, quotation checked word for word: “Not all have accompanying Lean formalizations.”).
Limits
DiscoverIA has not checked this result itself.
Key facts
- Claimed by
- OpenAI (unreleased internal model)
announced on Oct 6, 2026 - Nature
- new result
- Field
- Mathematics (Algebra)
- In openai/math
- family 202, section “Algebra”, 1 manuscript dated Sep 23, 2026
- Lean proof
- none supplied
- Revisions
- none reported by the claimant
- Checked by
- no verifier identified
- Sources
- 2 : 2 links only
- This entry
- AI draft, not reviewed
Status history
Only one observation so far.
- 01
First observation:Not evaluatedCurrent status
Family with no Lean proof supplied. No third-party evaluation read.
Source: github.comread word for word
An observation is added; none is ever erased.
In the same set
openai/math: 719 manuscripts in 372 families from an unreleased internal model · entry 196 of 372, by family number
- Not evaluated : Counterexamples to conjectures of Auslander–Reiten, Tachikawa, and Nakayama (family 199)
- Not evaluated : Eisenbud–Green–Harris and lex-plus-powers in characteristic zero (family 200)
- Not evaluated : A counterexample to Kurosh's division-ring problem (family 201)
- Not evaluated : The blockwise Alperin weight conjecture (family 202)
- Not evaluated : Donovan's conjecture over fields and discrete valuation rings (family 203)
- Not evaluated : Tensor saturation for even spin groups (family 204)
- Not evaluated : Saxl's conjecture and universal tensor squares (family 205)
Report an error or suggest a source
Thank you, your message was sent.
Sending failed. Try again, or write to contact@discoveria.ai.
Is your result listed?What each status requires, correcting this entry, replying to it.