Not evaluated
The Benjamini–Schramm nonuniqueness conjecture (family 214)
The gist
On October 6, 2026, OpenAI announced, for the Benjamini–Schramm nonuniqueness conjecture, a manuscript on nonuniqueness of percolation on nonamenable quasi-transitive graphs.
DiscoverIA status on October 12, 2026: not evaluated, meaning no third-party evaluation found.
AI draft, not reviewedWhat has not been reviewed?
Text written by an AI (DiscoverIA pipeline), on . The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
Cite this entry
A single status snapshot since Oct 12, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot.
Cite snapshot 1, Oct 12, 2026
APA citation with the dated link
BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-oai-fam-214-benjaminischramm-nonuniqueness-conjecture-r1
@misc{discoveria-oai-fam-214-benjaminischramm-nonuniqueness-conjecture-r1,
author = {{DiscoverIA}},
title = {The Benjamini–Schramm nonuniqueness conjecture (family 214)},
howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry oai-fam-214-benjaminischramm-nonuniqueness-conjecture},
note = {Status “Not evaluated”, snapshot 1, recorded on October 12, 2026. New result},
year = {2026},
url = {https://discoveria.ai/entry/oai-fam-214-benjaminischramm-nonuniqueness-conjecture#releve-1},
urldate = {2026-10-12}
}Dated link opens this snapshot in the history
To understand ≈ 20 s reading time, estimated
What it changes
Percolation consists in keeping or erasing each edge of a graph at random. Nonuniqueness refers to the random graph containing more than one infinite cluster (a set of vertices linked to one another). If the manuscript were correct, it would show that such a situation can occur, in the precise form it states.
What remains unclear
The Lean (a language in which a computer checks every step of a proof) is supplied by OpenAI: the repository marks its review “unchecked”, and no third-party verification has been found.
For experts
Sources, method, key facts, status history, report an error
Status
Not evaluated
Recorded on · github.com · 214.md
Step 1 of 4 on the scale: not evaluated. Next step: under review.
- Announced
- Recordednot evaluated
- nextTo follow
What this status means
Source reading : Source read word for word (level 3 of 3)
The result is declared neither right nor wrong.
To move to “Under review”: a public review under way. To “Peer reviewed”: a journal publication or a review by named experts.
Sources
- Main sourcegithub.com · CONTENTS.mdlink only, reading not recorded
- Repositorygithub.com · Nonuniqueness-of…link only, reading not recorded
- Lean proofgithub.com · 214.mdpage read word for word
- Lean proofgithub.com · BenjaminiSchramm.leanlink only, reading not recorded
- Lean proofgithub.com · CayleyPercolation.leanlink only, reading not recorded
Method
The manuscript “Nonuniqueness of percolation on nonamenable quasi-transitive graphs” is dated September 24, 2026; family 214 has only this one. The repository contains lean/docs/214.md and two Comparator statements (BenjaminiSchramm.lean and CayleyPercolation.lean, in lean/ComparatorChallenges). The family is absent from the sources of formalization.yaml, and history.md reports no revision of the manuscript. DiscoverIA status: not evaluated, meaning that no third-party evaluation has been found in the sources read. Set on October 12, 2026 from github.com (page read, quotation checked word for word: “describes the scope of the Lean formalization”).
Limits
No named third party: the recorded checks come from the claimant or from a platform tool. The claimant supplies a Lean proof; as of this date, DiscoverIA has found no independent verification of this proof or of the result.
Key facts
- Claimed by
- OpenAI (unreleased internal model)
announced on Oct 6, 2026 - Nature
- new result
- Field
- Mathematics (Probability and statistical mechanics)
- In openai/math
- family 214, section “Probability and statistical mechanics”, 1 manuscript dated Sep 24, 2026
- Lean proof
- supplied by the claimant, marked “unchecked” (not reviewed) in its repository
- Revisions
- none reported by the claimant
- Checked by
- claimant (Lean supplied, not checked by a third party)
- Sources
- 5 : 1 read word for word, 4 links only
- This entry
- AI draft, not reviewed
Status history
Only one observation so far.
- 01
First observation:Not evaluatedCurrent status
Family with a Lean proof supplied by the claimant. No third-party check read; the source marks this proof as not reviewed (“unchecked”).
Source: github.comread word for word
An observation is added; none is ever erased.
In the same set
openai/math: 719 manuscripts in 372 families from an unreleased internal model · entry 208 of 372, by family number
- Not evaluated : Geometry, diffusion, and spectra of random planar maps (family 211)
- Not evaluated : No bigeodesics and smooth limit shapes in planar first-passage percolation (family 212)
- Not evaluated : No infinite critical clusters on quasi-transitive graphs (family 213)
- Not evaluated : The Benjamini–Schramm nonuniqueness conjecture (family 214)
- Not evaluated : Massive continuum limits and exact mass asymptotics for planar O(n) models (family 215)
- Not evaluated : Critical logarithmic corrections and BKT scaling for the planar XY model (family 216)
- Not evaluated : The low-temperature Sherrington–Kirkpatrick fluctuation law (family 217)
Report an error or suggest a source
Thank you, your message was sent.
Sending failed. Try again, or write to contact@discoveria.ai.
Is your result listed?What each status requires, correcting this entry, replying to it.