Not evaluated
An infinite finitely presented residually finite 2-group (family 247)
The gist
OpenAI claims, in two manuscripts announced on October 6, 2026, infinite finitely presented groups: one residually finite and a 2-group, the other periodic.
DiscoverIA status on October 12, 2026: not evaluated, meaning no third-party evaluation found.
AI draft, not reviewedWhat has not been reviewed?
Text written by an AI (DiscoverIA pipeline), on . The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
Cite this entry
A single status snapshot since Oct 12, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot.
Cite snapshot 1, Oct 12, 2026
APA citation with the dated link
BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-oai-fam-247-infinite-finitely-presented-residually-r1
@misc{discoveria-oai-fam-247-infinite-finitely-presented-residually-r1,
author = {{DiscoverIA}},
title = {An infinite finitely presented residually finite 2-group (family 247)},
howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry oai-fam-247-infinite-finitely-presented-residually},
note = {Status “Not evaluated”, snapshot 1, recorded on October 12, 2026. New result},
year = {2026},
url = {https://discoveria.ai/entry/oai-fam-247-infinite-finitely-presented-residually#releve-1},
urldate = {2026-10-12}
}Dated link opens this snapshot in the history
To understand ≈ 30 s reading time, estimated
What it changes
If the manuscript on the 2-group held, it would describe an infinite finitely presented group (a finite number of generators and relations) in which every element has order a power of 2. This group would also be residually finite: every non-identity element stays non-identity in some finite quotient. If the manuscript on the periodic group held, it would describe an infinite finitely presented group in which every element has finite order.
What remains unclear
The Lean (a language in which a computer checks every step of a proof) is supplied by the claimant and marked “review: status: unchecked” in formalization.yaml. No third-party check has been read. It is not known which of the two results the Lean covers.
For experts
Sources, method, key facts, status history, report an error
Status
Not evaluated
Recorded on · github.com · 247.md
Step 1 of 4 on the scale: not evaluated. Next step: under review.
- Announced
- Recordednot evaluated
- nextTo follow
What this status means
Source reading : Source read word for word (level 3 of 3)
The result is declared neither right nor wrong.
To move to “Under review”: a public review under way. To “Peer reviewed”: a journal publication or a review by named experts.
Sources
- Main sourcegithub.com · CONTENTS.mdlink only, reading not recorded
- Repositorygithub.com · …residually-finite-2-group…link only, reading not recorded
- Repositorygithub.com · …periodic-group-September…link only, reading not recorded
- Lean proofgithub.com · 247.mdpage read word for word
- Lean proofgithub.com · PeriodicGroup.leanlink only, reading not recorded
Method
Two manuscripts: “An infinite finitely presented residually finite 2-group” (October 5, 2026) and “An infinite finitely presented periodic group” (September 23, 2026). A Comparator statement is described in lean/docs/247.md, with the file lean/ComparatorChallenges/PeriodicGroup.lean. The family is absent from the `sources` of formalization.yaml; history.md reports no revision. DiscoverIA status: not evaluated, meaning that no third-party evaluation has been found in the sources read. Set on October 12, 2026 from github.com (page read, quotation checked word for word: “describes the scope of the Lean formalization”).
Limits
No named third party: the recorded checks come from the claimant or from a platform tool. The claimant supplies a Lean proof; as of this date, DiscoverIA has found no independent verification of this proof or of the result.
Key facts
- Claimed by
- OpenAI (unreleased internal model)
announced on Oct 6, 2026 - Nature
- new result
- Field
- Mathematics (Group theory)
- In openai/math
- family 247, section “Group theory”, 2 manuscripts dated Sep 23, 2026
- Lean proof
- supplied by the claimant, marked “unchecked” (not reviewed) in its repository
- Revisions
- none reported by the claimant
- Checked by
- claimant (Lean supplied, not checked by a third party)
- Sources
- 5 : 1 read word for word, 4 links only
- This entry
- AI draft, not reviewed
Status history
Only one observation so far.
- 01
First observation:Not evaluatedCurrent status
Family with a Lean proof supplied by the claimant. No third-party check read; the source marks this proof as not reviewed (“unchecked”).
Source: github.comread word for word
An observation is added; none is ever erased.
In the same set
openai/math: 719 manuscripts in 372 families from an unreleased internal model · entry 241 of 372, by family number
- Contested : The Partition Principle does not imply Choice (family 244)
- Not evaluated : The β-Barendregt–Geuvers–Klop conjecture (family 245)
- Not evaluated : Cannon's conjecture (family 246)
- Not evaluated : An infinite finitely presented residually finite 2-group (family 247)
- Not evaluated : Thompson's group F is nonamenable (family 248)
- Not evaluated : A finitely generated counterexample to Eilenberg–Ganea (family 249)
- Not evaluated : The Boone–Higman conjecture and higher finiteness (family 250)
Report an error or suggest a source
Thank you, your message was sent.
Sending failed. Try again, or write to contact@discoveria.ai.
Is your result listed?What each status requires, correcting this entry, replying to it.