Skip to content
SearchFR · Français
Get started

Not evaluated

Gersten's conjecture for one-relator groups (family 258)

The gist

On October 6, 2026, OpenAI announced 2 manuscripts on one-relator groups, filed under the title “Gersten's conjecture for one-relator groups”.

DiscoverIA status on October 12, 2026: not evaluated, meaning no third-party evaluation found.

Status detailsDetails

AI draft, not reviewedWhat has not been reviewed?

Text written by an AI (DiscoverIA pipeline), on . The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.

FollowReport

Cite this entry

A single status snapshot since Oct 12, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot.

Cite snapshot 1, Oct 12, 2026

APA citation with the dated link

DiscoverIA. (2026, October 12). Gersten's conjecture for one-relator groups (family 258) [Status: Not evaluated, snapshot 1]. DiscoverIA registry. https://discoveria.ai/entry/oai-fam-258-gerstens-conjecture-one-relator-groups#releve-1

BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-oai-fam-258-gerstens-conjecture-one-relator-groups-r1

@misc{discoveria-oai-fam-258-gerstens-conjecture-one-relator-groups-r1,
  author       = {{DiscoverIA}},
  title        = {Gersten's conjecture for one-relator groups (family 258)},
  howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry oai-fam-258-gerstens-conjecture-one-relator-groups},
  note         = {Status “Not evaluated”, snapshot 1, recorded on October 12, 2026. New result},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://discoveria.ai/entry/oai-fam-258-gerstens-conjecture-one-relator-groups#releve-1},
  urldate      = {2026-10-12}
}

Dated link opens this snapshot in the history

https://discoveria.ai/entry/oai-fam-258-gerstens-conjecture-one-relator-groups#releve-1

To understand ≈ 20 s reading time, estimated

What it changes

A one-relator group is defined by generators and a single relation between them. If the manuscripts held, the first would conclude that those which are “Baumslag-Solitar-free” are hyperbolic, and the second would concern the “virtual compact specialness” of the hyperbolic ones.

What remains unclear

No Lean (a language in which a computer checks every step of a proof) is supplied, and no third-party evaluation is read in the sources. They do not specify the link between these 2 manuscripts and Gersten's conjecture.

For experts

Sources, method, key facts, status history, report an error

Status

Not evaluated

Recorded on · github.com · README.md

Step 1 of 4 on the scale: not evaluated. Next step: under review.

  1. Announced
  2. Recordednot evaluated
  3. nextTo follow
What this status means

Source reading : Source read word for word (level 3 of 3)

The result is declared neither right nor wrong.

To move to “Under review”: a public review under way. To “Peer reviewed”: a journal publication or a review by named experts.

Full history

Proofs
manuscrit : Baumslag-Solitar-free one-relator groups are hyperbolic (preprints/Baumslag-Solitar-free-one-relator-groups-are-hyperbolic-September-25-2026), manuscrit : Virtual compact specialness of hyperbolic one-relator groups (preprints/Virtual-compact-specialness-of-hyperbolic-one-relator-groups-September-25-2026), aucun Lean fourni (pas de lean/docs/258.md)

Sources

Method

2 manuscripts dated September 25, 2026: “Baumslag-Solitar-free one-relator groups are hyperbolic” and “Virtual compact specialness of hyperbolic one-relator groups”. The family is filed under the section “Group theory” (overview.tex), with no lean/docs/258.md. DiscoverIA status: not evaluated, meaning that no third-party evaluation has been found in the sources read. Set on October 12, 2026 from github.com (page read, quotation checked word for word: “Not all have accompanying Lean formalizations.”).

Limits

DiscoverIA has not checked this result itself.

Key facts

Claimed by
OpenAI (unreleased internal model)
announced on Oct 6, 2026
Nature
new result
Field
Mathematics (Group theory)
In openai/math
family 258, section “Group theory”, 2 manuscripts dated Sep 25, 2026
Lean proof
none supplied
Revisions
none reported by the claimant
Checked by
no verifier identified
Sources
3 : 3 links only
This entry
AI draft, not reviewed

Status history

Only one observation so far.

  1. 01

    First observation:Not evaluatedCurrent status

    Family with no Lean proof supplied. No third-party evaluation read.

    Source: github.comread word for word

An observation is added; none is ever erased.

In the same set

openai/math: 719 manuscripts in 372 families from an unreleased internal model · entry 252 of 372, by family number

See all 372 entries

Report an error or suggest a source

How DiscoverIA uses your address and how to exercise your rights: privacy policy.

Is your result listed?What each status requires, correcting this entry, replying to it.