Not evaluated
Strong cosmic censorship near two-ended Kerr data (family 264)
The gist
On October 6, 2026, OpenAI claimed, in three manuscripts, generic future inextendibility near Kerr spacetimes.
DiscoverIA status on October 12, 2026: not evaluated, meaning no third-party evaluation found.
AI draft, not reviewedWhat has not been reviewed?
Text written by an AI (DiscoverIA pipeline), on . The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
Cite this entry
A single status snapshot since Oct 12, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot.
Cite snapshot 1, Oct 12, 2026
APA citation with the dated link
BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-oai-fam-264-strong-cosmic-censorship-near-two-ended-kerr-r1
@misc{discoveria-oai-fam-264-strong-cosmic-censorship-near-two-ended-kerr-r1,
author = {{DiscoverIA}},
title = {Strong cosmic censorship near two-ended Kerr data (family 264)},
howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry oai-fam-264-strong-cosmic-censorship-near-two-ended-kerr},
note = {Status “Not evaluated”, snapshot 1, recorded on October 12, 2026. New result},
year = {2026},
url = {https://discoveria.ai/entry/oai-fam-264-strong-cosmic-censorship-near-two-ended-kerr#releve-1},
urldate = {2026-10-12}
}Dated link opens this snapshot in the history
To understand ≈ 30 s reading time, estimated
What it changes
The three manuscripts address three distinct statements, according to the regularity of the extension: a square-integrable connection, C1 or C2. If these statements held up, for generic data close to a Kerr spacetime (a rotating black hole), the spacetime could not be extended to the future with those regularities. The titles do not give the exact assumptions.
What remains unclear
No Lean (a language in which a computer checks every step of a proof) is provided, and no third-party assessment is recorded, so it is not known whether these three results hold up. The manuscript titles do not mention strong cosmic censorship, which is named in the title of the family.
For experts
Sources, method, key facts, status history, report an error
Status
Not evaluated
Recorded on · github.com · README.md
Step 1 of 4 on the scale: not evaluated. Next step: under review.
- Announced
- Recordednot evaluated
- nextTo follow
What this status means
Source reading : Source read word for word (level 3 of 3)
The result is declared neither right nor wrong.
To move to “Under review”: a public review under way. To “Peer reviewed”: a journal publication or a review by named experts.
Sources
- Main sourcegithub.com · CONTENTS.mdlink only, reading not recorded
- Repositorygithub.com · Generic-Future…link only, reading not recorded
- Repositorygithub.com · Generic-C1-Future…link only, reading not recorded
- Repositorygithub.com · Quantitative-Near-Kerr…link only, reading not recorded
Method
Three manuscripts dated September 23, 2026, the first being “Generic Future Inextendibility with Square-Integrable Connection Near a Fixed Kerr Spacetime”. The other two: “Generic C1 Future Inextendibility Near Rotating Subextremal Kerr Spacetimes” and “Quantitative Near-Kerr Evolution and Generic C2 Future Inextendibility”. DiscoverIA status: not evaluated, meaning that no third-party evaluation has been found in the sources read. Set on October 12, 2026 from github.com (page read, quotation checked word for word: “Not all have accompanying Lean formalizations.”).
Limits
DiscoverIA has not checked this result itself.
Key facts
- Claimed by
- OpenAI (unreleased internal model)
announced on Oct 6, 2026 - Nature
- new result
- Field
- Mathematics (Mathematical physics)
- In openai/math
- family 264, section “Mathematical physics”, 3 manuscripts dated Sep 23, 2026
- Lean proof
- none supplied
- Revisions
- none reported by the claimant
- Checked by
- no verifier identified
- Sources
- 4 : 4 links only
- This entry
- AI draft, not reviewed
Status history
Only one observation so far.
- 01
First observation:Not evaluatedCurrent status
Family with no Lean proof supplied. No third-party evaluation read.
Source: github.comread word for word
An observation is added; none is ever erased.
In the same set
openai/math: 719 manuscripts in 372 families from an unreleased internal model · entry 258 of 372, by family number
- Not evaluated : Localization and delocalization in the Anderson model (family 261)
- Not evaluated : Sharp one-dimensional Lieb–Thirring inequalities (family 262)
- Not evaluated : The ionization and generalized ionization conjectures (family 263)
- Not evaluated : Strong cosmic censorship near two-ended Kerr data (family 264)
- Not evaluated : The two-dimensional gapped area law (family 265)
- Not evaluated : Exactly three mutually unbiased bases in dimension six (family 266)
- Not evaluated : Positive-temperature Bose–Einstein condensation and quantum depletion (family 267)
Report an error or suggest a source
Thank you, your message was sent.
Sending failed. Try again, or write to contact@discoveria.ai.
Is your result listed?What each status requires, correcting this entry, replying to it.