Not evaluated
Threshold repetition for entangled games (family 277)
The gist
OpenAI claims, in an announcement of October 6, 2026, a result on threshold parallel repetition for finite-dimensional entangled games.
DiscoverIA status on October 12, 2026: not evaluated, meaning no third-party evaluation found.
AI draft, not reviewedWhat has not been reviewed?
Text written by an AI (DiscoverIA pipeline), on . The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
Cite this entry
A single status snapshot since Oct 12, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot.
Cite snapshot 1, Oct 12, 2026
APA citation with the dated link
BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-oai-fam-277-threshold-repetition-entangled-games-r1
@misc{discoveria-oai-fam-277-threshold-repetition-entangled-games-r1,
author = {{DiscoverIA}},
title = {Threshold repetition for entangled games (family 277)},
howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry oai-fam-277-threshold-repetition-entangled-games},
note = {Status “Not evaluated”, snapshot 1, recorded on October 12, 2026. New result},
year = {2026},
url = {https://discoveria.ai/entry/oai-fam-277-threshold-repetition-entangled-games#releve-1},
urldate = {2026-10-12}
}Dated link opens this snapshot in the history
To understand ≈ 20 s reading time, estimated
What it changes
If the manuscript held, the result would concern cooperative finite-dimensional games in which players, without communicating, share entangled particles. Parallel repetition means playing several copies of the game at the same time.
What remains unclear
The Lean (a language in which a computer checks every step of a proof) is supplied by the claimant and marked “review: status: unchecked” in formalization.yaml. No third-party check has been read. The precise statement of the result and the exact meaning of “threshold” here are not known.
For experts
Sources, method, key facts, status history, report an error
Status
Not evaluated
Recorded on · github.com · 277.md
Step 1 of 4 on the scale: not evaluated. Next step: under review.
- Announced
- Recordednot evaluated
- nextTo follow
What this status means
Source reading : Source read word for word (level 3 of 3)
The result is declared neither right nor wrong.
To move to “Under review”: a public review under way. To “Peer reviewed”: a journal publication or a review by named experts.
Sources
- Main sourcegithub.com · CONTENTS.mdlink only, reading not recorded
- Repositorygithub.com · Threshold-parallel…link only, reading not recorded
- Lean proofgithub.com · 277.mdpage read word for word
- Lean proofgithub.com · EntangledGames.leanlink only, reading not recorded
Method
One manuscript, “Threshold parallel repetition for finite-dimensional entangled games”, dated September 25, 2026. A Comparator statement is described in lean/docs/277.md, with the file lean/ComparatorChallenges/EntangledGames.lean. The family is present in the `sources` of formalization.yaml; history.md reports no revision. DiscoverIA status: not evaluated, meaning that no third-party evaluation has been found in the sources read. Set on October 12, 2026 from github.com (page read, quotation checked word for word: “describes the scope of the Lean formalization”).
Limits
No named third party: the recorded checks come from the claimant or from a platform tool. The claimant supplies a Lean proof; as of this date, DiscoverIA has found no independent verification of this proof or of the result.
Key facts
- Claimed by
- OpenAI (unreleased internal model)
announced on Oct 6, 2026 - Nature
- new result
- Field
- Mathematics (Mathematical physics)
- In openai/math
- family 277, section “Mathematical physics”, 1 manuscript dated Sep 25, 2026
- Lean proof
- supplied by the claimant, marked “unchecked” (not reviewed) in its repository
- Revisions
- none reported by the claimant
- Checked by
- claimant (Lean supplied, not checked by a third party)
- Sources
- 4 : 1 read word for word, 3 links only
- This entry
- AI draft, not reviewed
Status history
Only one observation so far.
- 01
First observation:Not evaluatedCurrent status
Family with a Lean proof supplied by the claimant. No third-party check read; the source marks this proof as not reviewed (“unchecked”).
Source: github.comread word for word
An observation is added; none is ever erased.
In the same set
openai/math: 719 manuscripts in 372 families from an unreleased internal model · entry 271 of 372, by family number
- Not evaluated : Moore's parity conjecture for QAC⁰ (family 274)
- Not evaluated : QMA-hardness of continuum Coulomb energy (family 275)
- Not evaluated : The classical capacity of generalized amplitude damping (family 276)
- Not evaluated : Threshold repetition for entangled games (family 277)
- Not evaluated : Failure of Kohn–Sham ensemble representation (family 278)
- Not evaluated : Exact quantum factoring over a fixed finite gate set (family 279)
- Not evaluated : Strong locality for strongly rational unitary vertex operator algebras (family 280)
Report an error or suggest a source
Thank you, your message was sent.
Sending failed. Try again, or write to contact@discoveria.ai.
Is your result listed?What each status requires, correcting this entry, replying to it.