Not evaluated
Smith–Toda complexes at every height with varying primes (family 308)
The gist
In its release of October 6, 2026, OpenAI presents two manuscripts on finite Smith–Toda complexes, in topology.
DiscoverIA status on October 12, 2026: not evaluated, meaning no third-party evaluation found.
AI draft, not reviewedWhat has not been reviewed?
Text written by an AI (DiscoverIA pipeline), on . The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
Cite this entry
A single status snapshot since Oct 12, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot.
Cite snapshot 1, Oct 12, 2026
APA citation with the dated link
BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-oai-fam-308-smithtoda-complexes-every-height-varying-r1
@misc{discoveria-oai-fam-308-smithtoda-complexes-every-height-varying-r1,
author = {{DiscoverIA}},
title = {Smith–Toda complexes at every height with varying primes (family 308)},
howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry oai-fam-308-smithtoda-complexes-every-height-varying},
note = {Status “Not evaluated”, snapshot 1, recorded on October 12, 2026. New result},
year = {2026},
url = {https://discoveria.ai/entry/oai-fam-308-smithtoda-complexes-every-height-varying#releve-1},
urldate = {2026-10-12}
}Dated link opens this snapshot in the history
To understand ≈ 20 s reading time, estimated
What it changes
If the manuscripts were correct, the entry would provide such complexes at every height, for varying primes. One of the two deals with a specific case, V(4) at the prime 1009.
What remains unclear
No proof in Lean (a language in which a computer checks every step of a proof) is supplied for this family, and no third-party verification is recorded. The sources read do not give the exact statements of the results.
For experts
Sources, method, key facts, status history, report an error
Status
Not evaluated
Recorded on · github.com · README.md
Step 1 of 4 on the scale: not evaluated. Next step: under review.
- Announced
- Recordednot evaluated
- nextTo follow
What this status means
Source reading : Source read word for word (level 3 of 3)
The result is declared neither right nor wrong.
To move to “Under review”: a public review under way. To “Peer reviewed”: a journal publication or a review by named experts.
Sources
- Main sourcegithub.com · CONTENTS.mdlink only, reading not recorded
- Repositorygithub.com · Finite-Smith-Toda…link only, reading not recorded
- Repositorygithub.com · A-finite-Smith-Toda…link only, reading not recorded
Method
The openai/math repository contains two manuscripts, “Finite Smith–Toda Complexes at Varying Primes” and “A finite Smith–Toda complex V(4) at the prime 1009”, dated September 23, 2026. No lean/docs/308.md file is supplied; history.md reports no revision of these manuscripts. DiscoverIA status: not evaluated, meaning that no third-party evaluation has been found in the sources read. Set on October 12, 2026 from github.com (page read, quotation checked word for word: “Not all have accompanying Lean formalizations.”).
Limits
DiscoverIA has not checked this result itself.
Key facts
- Claimed by
- OpenAI (unreleased internal model)
announced on Oct 6, 2026 - Nature
- new result
- Field
- Mathematics (Topology)
- In openai/math
- family 308, section “Topology”, 2 manuscripts dated Sep 23, 2026
- Lean proof
- none supplied
- Revisions
- none reported by the claimant
- Checked by
- no verifier identified
- Sources
- 3 : 3 links only
- This entry
- AI draft, not reviewed
Status history
Only one observation so far.
- 01
First observation:Not evaluatedCurrent status
Family with no Lean proof supplied. No third-party evaluation read.
Source: github.comread word for word
An observation is added; none is ever erased.
In the same set
openai/math: 719 manuscripts in 372 families from an unreleased internal model · entry 302 of 372, by family number
- Not evaluated : Counterexamples to disk embedding and Wall's manifold conjecture (family 305)
- Not evaluated : The purely cosmetic surgery conjecture for knots in S³ (family 306)
- Not evaluated : Failure of rational injectivity for maximal coarse assembly (family 307)
- Not evaluated : Smith–Toda complexes at every height with varying primes (family 308)
- Not evaluated : The Kervaire invariant problem at the prime three (family 309)
- Not evaluated : Quillen's conjecture in rational homology (family 310)
- Not evaluated : Chai's invariant-ideal conjecture (family 311)
Report an error or suggest a source
Thank you, your message was sent.
Sending failed. Try again, or write to contact@discoveria.ai.
Is your result listed?What each status requires, correcting this entry, replying to it.