Not evaluated
Counterexamples to the Hahn–Wilson conjecture at height two (family 319)
The gist
On October 6, 2026, OpenAI announced counterexamples to the Hahn–Wilson conjecture at height two, from an unreleased internal model.
DiscoverIA status on October 12, 2026: not evaluated, meaning no third-party evaluation found.
AI draft, not reviewedWhat has not been reviewed?
Text written by an AI (DiscoverIA pipeline), on . The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
Cite this entry
A single status snapshot since Oct 12, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot.
Cite snapshot 1, Oct 12, 2026
APA citation with the dated link
BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-oai-fam-319-counterexamples-hahnwilson-conjecture-height-r1
@misc{discoveria-oai-fam-319-counterexamples-hahnwilson-conjecture-height-r1,
author = {{DiscoverIA}},
title = {Counterexamples to the Hahn–Wilson conjecture at height two (family 319)},
howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry oai-fam-319-counterexamples-hahnwilson-conjecture-height},
note = {Status “Not evaluated”, snapshot 1, recorded on October 12, 2026. New result},
year = {2026},
url = {https://discoveria.ai/entry/oai-fam-319-counterexamples-hahnwilson-conjecture-height#releve-1},
urldate = {2026-10-12}
}Dated link opens this snapshot in the history
To understand ≈ 20 s reading time, estimated
What it changes
If the manuscript were correct, the Hahn–Wilson conjecture would be false at height two. The repository files this work under topology.
What remains unclear
No Lean proof (Lean is a language in which a computer checks every step of a proof) is supplied for this family, and no third-party assessment is recorded. The sources read give neither the statement of the conjecture nor that of the counterexamples.
For experts
Sources, method, key facts, status history, report an error
Status
Not evaluated
Recorded on · github.com · README.md
Step 1 of 4 on the scale: not evaluated. Next step: under review.
- Announced
- Recordednot evaluated
- nextTo follow
What this status means
Source reading : Source read word for word (level 3 of 3)
The result is declared neither right nor wrong.
To move to “Under review”: a public review under way. To “Peer reviewed”: a journal publication or a review by named experts.
Sources
- Main sourcegithub.com · CONTENTS.mdlink only, reading not recorded
- Repositorygithub.com · Counterexamples-to-the…link only, reading not recorded
Method
The openai/math repository contains one manuscript, “Counterexamples to the Hahn-Wilson conjecture at height two”, dated September 26, 2026 (family 319, section “Topology” of overview.tex). The absence of Lean is inferred from the absence of a lean/docs/319.md file; OpenAI's README states: “Not all have accompanying Lean formalizations.” history.md reports no revision for the manuscripts of this family. DiscoverIA status: not evaluated, meaning that no third-party evaluation has been found in the sources read. Set on October 12, 2026 from github.com (page read, quotation checked word for word).
Limits
DiscoverIA has not checked this result itself.
Key facts
- Claimed by
- OpenAI (unreleased internal model)
announced on Oct 6, 2026 - Nature
- new result
- Field
- Mathematics (Topology)
- In openai/math
- family 319, section “Topology”, 1 manuscript dated Sep 26, 2026
- Lean proof
- none supplied
- Revisions
- none reported by the claimant
- Checked by
- no verifier identified
- Sources
- 2 : 2 links only
- This entry
- AI draft, not reviewed
Status history
Only one observation so far.
- 01
First observation:Not evaluatedCurrent status
Family with no Lean proof supplied. No third-party evaluation read.
Source: github.comread word for word
An observation is added; none is ever erased.
In the same set
openai/math: 719 manuscripts in 372 families from an unreleased internal model · entry 313 of 372, by family number
- Not evaluated : Curtis’s conjecture (family 316)
- Not evaluated : Thomason model structures in every strict higher dimension (family 317)
- Not evaluated : Chromatic splitting: counterexamples and filtrations (family 318)
- Not evaluated : Counterexamples to the Hahn–Wilson conjecture at height two (family 319)
- Not evaluated : A four-dimensional counterexample to Borel rigidity (family 320)
- Not evaluated : A counterexample to Wall's finite D(2) conjecture (family 321)
- Not evaluated : Tingley's sphere-isometry problem (family 322)
Report an error or suggest a source
Thank you, your message was sent.
Sending failed. Try again, or write to contact@discoveria.ai.
Is your result listed?What each status requires, correcting this entry, replying to it.