AlphaEvolve: 4×4 complex matrices in 48 multiplications, kissing number 593 in dimension 11
Status
Not evaluated
Recorded on · deepmind.google
- Announced
- Recordednot evaluated
- nextTo follow
What this status means
Source reading : Source read through an AI summary (level 2 of 3)
No DiscoverIA status yet; this does not mean nobody has checked it.
To move to “Under review”: a public review under way. To “Peer reviewed”: a journal publication or a review by named experts.
The gist
Google DeepMind presented AlphaEvolve on 14 May 2025: 4×4 complex matrices multiplied in 48 multiplications, a kissing number of 593 in dimension 11, and more than 50 open problems (about 75 % matched, 20 % improved); no DiscoverIA status yet.
Cite this entry
A single status snapshot since Oct 11, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot.
Cite snapshot 1, Oct 11, 2026
APA citation with the dated link
BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-alphaevolve-2025-05-14-r1
@misc{discoveria-alphaevolve-2025-05-14-r1,
author = {{DiscoverIA}},
title = {AlphaEvolve: 4×4 complex matrices in 48 multiplications, kissing number 593 in dimension 11},
howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry alphaevolve-2025-05-14},
note = {Status « Not evaluated », snapshot 1, recorded on October 11, 2026. new result},
year = {2026},
url = {https://discoveria.ai/en/fiche/alphaevolve-2025-05-14/#releve-1},
urldate = {2026-10-11}
}Dated link opens this snapshot in the history
Text written by an AI (DiscoverIA pipeline), on Reviewed by: nobody yetReport an error
What has not been reviewed?
The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
Key facts
- Claimed by
- Google DeepMind
announced on May 14, 2025 - Nature
- new result
- Field
- Mathematics (algorithms / combinatorics / geometry)
- Checked by
- no verifier identified
- Sources (domains)
- 1 : 1 links only
- This entry
- AI draft, not reviewed
To understand
Analogy
Imagine an assistant that writes programs to solve calculation puzzles, with each result then compared to the best known scores.
What it changes
If the results hold, they would show that a coding agent powered by Gemini can match most of the best known results on open problems in mathematics and algorithms, and improve some of them. Announced examples include 4×4 complex matrices multiplied in 48 multiplications and a kissing number of 593 in dimension 11.
What remains unclear
The code and constructions are published, but no verifier is named: nothing has been checked by a third party. The proportions (about 75 % matched, 20 % improved) come from DeepMind's own announcement, which is the only source read.
1 source.
For experts
Sources(domains)
- primairedeepmind.googlelink only, reading not recorded
Method
Status “not evaluated” recorded on 11 October 2026 from deepmind.google (page read through a model summary, quotation not rechecked).
Limits
The status source was read through a model summary; its quotation was not rechecked. DiscoverIA has recorded no independent evaluation as of this date.
Imagine an assistant that writes programs to solve calculation puzzles, with each result then compared to the best known scores.
Status history
Only one observation so far.
An observation is added; none is ever erased.
Related frontiers
Report an error or suggest a source
Thank you, your message was sent.
Sending failed. Try again, or write to [email protected].