Mathematical exploration and discovery at scale: 67 problems with AlphaEvolve
Status
Not evaluated
Recorded on · arxiv.org
- Announced
- Recordednot evaluated
- nextTo follow
What this status means
Source reading : Source read through an AI summary (level 2 of 3)
No DiscoverIA status yet; this does not mean nobody has checked it.
To move to “Under review”: a public review under way. To “Peer reviewed”: a journal publication or a review by named experts.
The gist
Georgiev, Gómez-Serrano, Tao and Wagner posted an arXiv preprint on 3 November 2025 covering 67 mathematics problems explored with AlphaEvolve (analysis, combinatorics, geometry, number theory); no DiscoverIA status yet.
Cite this entry
A single status snapshot since Oct 11, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot.
Cite snapshot 1, Oct 11, 2026
APA citation with the dated link
BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-alphaevolve-67-problems-r1
@misc{discoveria-alphaevolve-67-problems-r1,
author = {{DiscoverIA}},
title = {Mathematical exploration and discovery at scale: 67 problems with AlphaEvolve},
howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry alphaevolve-67-problems},
note = {Status « Not evaluated », snapshot 1, recorded on October 11, 2026. new result},
year = {2026},
url = {https://discoveria.ai/en/fiche/alphaevolve-67-problems/#releve-1},
urldate = {2026-10-11}
}Dated link opens this snapshot in the history
Text written by an AI (DiscoverIA pipeline), on Reviewed by: nobody yetReport an error
What has not been reviewed?
The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
Key facts
- Claimed by
- Georgiev, Gómez-Serrano, Tao, Wagner (avec AlphaEvolve)
announced on Nov 3, 2025 - Nature
- new result
- Field
- Mathematics
- Checked by
- authors (including T. Tao)
- Sources (domains)
- 1 : 1 links only
- This entry
- AI draft, not reviewed
To understand
Analogy
Imagine a team of mathematicians handing an automatic assistant a long list of puzzles and looking, problem by problem, at what it brings back.
What it changes
If the results hold, this work would give an overview of what AlphaEvolve can contribute across 67 problems from several areas of mathematics, rather than a single isolated example. The constructions can be checked by program.
What remains unclear
The text is a preprint: no journal reference was found on the arXiv page (versions of 3 November and 22 December 2025). The constructions were checked by the authors themselves, including T. Tao, not by a named third party. This entry does not detail the results problem by problem.
1 source.
For experts
Sources(domains)
- primairearxiv.orglink only, reading not recorded
Method
Status “not evaluated” recorded on 11 October 2026 from arxiv.org (page read through a model summary, quotation not rechecked).
Limits
The status source was read through a model summary; its quotation was not rechecked. DiscoverIA has recorded no independent evaluation as of this date.
Imagine a team of mathematicians handing an automatic assistant a long list of puzzles and looking, problem by problem, at what it brings back.
Status history
Only one observation so far.
- 01
First observation:Not evaluatedCurrent status
no journal reference found on the arXiv page
Source: arxiv.orgread through an AI summary
An observation is added; none is ever erased.
Report an error or suggest a source
Thank you, your message was sent.
Sending failed. Try again, or write to [email protected].