Skip to content
FR · Français
Get started
Registry

EinsteinArena: a platform where AI agents tackle open problems with public verifiers

Status

Not evaluated

Recorded on · together.ai

  1. Announced
  2. Recordednot evaluated
  3. nextTo follow
What this status means

Source reading : Source read word for word (level 3 of 3)

No DiscoverIA status yet; this does not mean nobody has checked it.

To move to “Under review”: a public review under way. To “Peer reviewed”: a journal publication or a review by named experts.

Full history

The gist

EinsteinArena is a platform where AI agents work on open mathematics problems with public verifiers; Together AI and Stanford announce new records (blog post of 13 April 2026); no DiscoverIA status yet.

FollowReport

Cite this entry

A single status snapshot since Oct 12, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot.

Cite snapshot 1, Oct 12, 2026

APA citation with the dated link

DiscoverIA. (2026, October 12,). EinsteinArena: a platform where AI agents tackle open problems with public verifiers [Status : Not evaluated, snapshot 1]. DiscoverIA registry. https://discoveria.ai/en/fiche/einsteinarena-together-ai/#releve-1

BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-einsteinarena-together-ai-r1

@misc{discoveria-einsteinarena-together-ai-r1,
  author       = {{DiscoverIA}},
  title        = {EinsteinArena: a platform where AI agents tackle open problems with public verifiers},
  howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry einsteinarena-together-ai},
  note         = {Status « Not evaluated », snapshot 1, recorded on October 12, 2026. new result},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://discoveria.ai/en/fiche/einsteinarena-together-ai/#releve-1},
  urldate      = {2026-10-12}
}

Dated link opens this snapshot in the history

https://discoveria.ai/en/fiche/einsteinarena-together-ai/#releve-1

Text written by an AI (DiscoverIA pipeline), on Reviewed by: nobody yetReport an error

What has not been reviewed?

The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.

The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.

Key facts

Claimed by
Together AI / Stanford (EinsteinArena)
announced on Apr 13, 2026
Nature
new result
Field
Mathematics (optimisation, discrete geometry, analysis, combinatorics (open problems with a public checker))
Checked by
the platform's public checkers (a tool); no third party named
Sources (domains)
7 : 3 read word for word, 4 links only
This entry
AI draft, not reviewed

To understand

Analogy

Imagine an online contest where everyone submits a solution to a puzzle and an automatic counter, the same for all, computes the score. The ranking moves as soon as someone does better.

What it changes

If the records hold, this kind of platform would let anyone follow in public, problem by problem, how far AI agents push known values, each with its verifier and a downloadable solution. The batch gathers 16 entries, all not yet evaluated. For the kissing number in dimension 11, the paper moves the bound from 593 to 604.

What remains unclear

The verifiers are programs run by the platform, not third parties: no outside reviewer is named. The count of records differs by source: 12 on the arXiv abstract page, 11 in the HTML abstract, in table 1 and in the blog, which makes 13 problems when the paper and the blog are combined. The paper states that the result at 604 came from a series of submissions, public discussions and verifier revisions.

For experts

7 sources.

For experts

Proofs
papier arXiv 2606.10402 (v2, CC BY 4.0), blog Together AI, vérificateurs et solutions publics (API), dépôt new-SOTA et dépôt MIT de la plateforme

Sources(domains)

  • primairearxiv.orgpage read word for word · consulted on Oct 12, 2026 · improved the best known lower bound from 593 to 604
  • primairearxiv.orgpage read word for word · consulted on Oct 12, 2026 · 12 new state-of-the-art results
  • articletogether.aipage read word for word · consulted on Oct 12, 2026 · have already discovered the new best solutions to 11 open math problems
  • depoteinsteinarena.comlink only, reading not recorded
  • depoteinsteinarena.comlink only, reading not recorded
  • depotgithub.comlink only, reading not recorded
  • depotgithub.comlink only, reading not recorded

Method

Status “not evaluated” recorded on 12 October 2026 from together.ai (page read, quotation checked word for word).

Limits

No named third party: the recorded checks come from the claimant or from a platform tool. DiscoverIA has recorded no independent evaluation as of this date.

To understand

Imagine an online contest where everyone submits a solution to a puzzle and an automatic counter, the same for all, computes the score.

Parts of this announcement (16)

TitleStatus
Kissing number in dimension 11: at least 604 spheres (previous bound 593, AlphaEvolve)Not evaluated
Erdős minimum overlap problem: upper bound 0.380871 (previous 0.380876, TTT-Discover)Not evaluated
First autocorrelation inequality: upper bound 1.5028609 (previous 1.5028629, TTT-Discover)Not evaluated
Second autocorrelation inequality: lower bound 0.9626 (previous 0.9610, AlphaEvolve)Not evaluated
Third autocorrelation inequality: upper bound 1.4523 (previous 1.4556, AlphaEvolve)Not evaluated
Flat polynomials of degree 69: 1.28093 (previous 1.34093, AlphaEvolve)Not evaluated
Distance ratio of 16 points in the plane: 12.889230 (previous 12.889266, AlphaEvolve)Not evaluated
Prime number theorem (lower bound on the score functional): 0.99490 (previous 0.92129, AlphaEvolve)Not evaluated
Circles in a rectangle, 21 of them: sum of radii 2.365832255 (previous 2.365832133, AlphaEvolve)Not evaluated
Tammes problem (50 points on the sphere): 0.5134721 (previous 0.5134719, AlphaEvolve)Not evaluated
Edges versus triangles (minimum triangle density): -0.71171 (previous -0.71249, AlphaEvolve)Not evaluated
12 unit hexagons in a hexagon: side 3.9416523 (previous 3.9419123, AlphaEvolve v2)Not evaluated
Heilbronn problem for convex regions (14 points): 0.0278355805 (previous 0.0278355715, AlphaEvolve v2)Not evaluated
Kakeya needle problem, discretised (n=128): area 0.10675394 (platform's cited state of the art: 0.107067)Not evaluated
Two-deletion correcting code of length 16: at least 219 codewords (public record cited: 215, Weindel and Heckel v2)Not evaluated
Ring loading problem (15 pairs): 1.125 (previous published construction 1.1190475685, AlphaEvolve)Not evaluated

Status history

Only one observation so far.

  1. 01

    First observation:Not evaluatedCurrent status

    not evaluated: only the platform's public checkers, no third party named

    Source: together.airead word for word

An observation is added; none is ever erased.

Report an error or suggest a source

How DiscoverIA uses your address and how to exercise your rights: privacy policy.

Bot check not configured.