Flat polynomials of degree 69: 1.28093 (previous 1.34093, AlphaEvolve)
Status
Not evaluated
Recorded on · arxiv.org
- Announced
- Recordednot evaluated
- nextTo follow
What this status means
Source reading : Source read word for word (level 3 of 3)
No DiscoverIA status yet; this does not mean nobody has checked it.
To move to “Under review”: a public review under way. To “Peer reviewed”: a journal publication or a review by named experts.
The gist
For flat polynomials of degree 69, the agent Together-AI submitted a score of 1.2809320528 on 25 March 2026, reported as 1.28093 in the paper, against 1.34093 for AlphaEvolve; smaller is better; no DiscoverIA status yet.
Cite this entry
A single status snapshot since Oct 12, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot.
Cite snapshot 1, Oct 12, 2026
APA citation with the dated link
BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-ea-flat-polynomials-69-r1
@misc{discoveria-ea-flat-polynomials-69-r1,
author = {{DiscoverIA}},
title = {Flat polynomials of degree 69: 1.28093 (previous 1.34093, AlphaEvolve)},
howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry ea-flat-polynomials-69},
note = {Status « Not evaluated », snapshot 1, recorded on October 12, 2026. new result},
year = {2026},
url = {https://discoveria.ai/en/fiche/ea-flat-polynomials-69/#releve-1},
urldate = {2026-10-12}
}Dated link opens this snapshot in the history
Text written by an AI (DiscoverIA pipeline), on Reviewed by: nobody yetReport an error
What has not been reviewed?
The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
Key facts
- Claimed by
- Together AI (agent « Together-AI », soumission du 2026-03-25 à 1,2809320528)
announced on Mar 25, 2026 - Nature
- new result
- Field
- Mathematics (polynomials with ±1 coefficients / flatness on the unit circle)
- Checked by
- the platform's public checker (a tool); no third party named
- Sources (domains)
- 6 : 2 read word for word, 4 links only
- This entry
- AI draft, not reviewed
To understand
Analogy
Imagine setting a row of switches, each on plus or minus, so that the resulting signal is as even as possible, with no sharp peak.
What it changes
If the value holds, the best known value, AlphaEvolve's (version 2, November 2025), would go from 1.34093 to 1.28093. The polynomials have coefficients of plus or minus one, and the aim is behaviour as uniform as possible on the unit circle.
What remains unclear
The verifier is a public program, not a third party: no outside reviewer is named. The online ranking shows 1.2807274949642549 (white, 10 August 2026), lower than the paper's value, and the online verifier may have been revised since.
6 sources.
For experts
Sources(domains)
- primairearxiv.orgpage read word for word · consulted on Oct 12, 2026 ·
we additionally report the previous best known result and the current best result
- articletogether.aipage read word for word · consulted on Oct 12, 2026 ·
we currently have the best known results for the following problems
- depotgithub.comlink only, reading not recorded
- depoteinsteinarena.comlink only, reading not recorded
- depoteinsteinarena.comlink only, reading not recorded
- depoteinsteinarena.comlink only, reading not recorded
Method
Status “not evaluated” recorded on 12 October 2026 from arxiv.org (page read, quotation checked word for word).
Limits
No named third party: the recorded checks come from the claimant or from a platform tool. DiscoverIA has recorded no independent evaluation as of this date.
Imagine setting a row of switches, each on plus or minus, so that the resulting signal is as even as possible, with no sharp peak.
In the same set
EinsteinArena: a platform where AI agents tackle open problems with public verifiers · 16 entries
- Not evaluated : First autocorrelation inequality: upper bound 1.5028609 (previous 1.5028629, TTT-Discover)
- Not evaluated : Second autocorrelation inequality: lower bound 0.9626 (previous 0.9610, AlphaEvolve)
- Not evaluated : Third autocorrelation inequality: upper bound 1.4523 (previous 1.4556, AlphaEvolve)
- Not evaluated : Flat polynomials of degree 69: 1.28093 (previous 1.34093, AlphaEvolve)
- Not evaluated : Distance ratio of 16 points in the plane: 12.889230 (previous 12.889266, AlphaEvolve)
- Not evaluated : Prime number theorem (lower bound on the score functional): 0.99490 (previous 0.92129, AlphaEvolve)
- Not evaluated : Circles in a rectangle, 21 of them: sum of radii 2.365832255 (previous 2.365832133, AlphaEvolve)
Status history
Only one observation so far.
- 01
First observation:Not evaluatedCurrent status
not evaluated: only the platform's public checker, no third party named
Source: arxiv.orgread word for word
An observation is added; none is ever erased.
Related frontiers
Report an error or suggest a source
Thank you, your message was sent.
Sending failed. Try again, or write to [email protected].