Erdős problem #1105: full solution found in the literature, with some wrong references noted by the wiki (Aletheia)
Status
Contested
Recorded on · github.com
Outside the verification path
What this status means
Source reading : Source read word for word (level 3 of 3)
Sourced public objection, with no established refutation.
It stays “Contested” until a refutation is established. It would become “Withdrawn” if its author withdrew it or the reference source marked it incorrect.
Dated archive: status recorded on the wiki frozen on Jun 30, 2026
The gist
The “AI contributions to Erdős problems” wiki, frozen on 30 June 2026, lists an AI contribution by Aletheia to Erdős problem #1105.
Cite this entry
The status has changed 1 times since Oct 12, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot.
Cite snapshot 1, Oct 12, 2026
APA citation with the dated link
BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-erdos-1105-aletheia-2a-r1
@misc{discoveria-erdos-1105-aletheia-2a-r1,
author = {{DiscoverIA}},
title = {Erdős problem #1105: full solution found in the literature, with some wrong references noted by the wiki (Aletheia)},
howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry erdos-1105-aletheia-2a},
note = {Status « Not evaluated », snapshot 1, recorded on October 12, 2026. literature search},
year = {2026},
url = {https://discoveria.ai/en/fiche/erdos-1105-aletheia-2a/#releve-1},
urldate = {2026-10-12}
}Dated link opens this snapshot in the history
Cite snapshot 2, Oct 12, 2026
APA citation with the dated link
BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-erdos-1105-aletheia-2a-r2
@misc{discoveria-erdos-1105-aletheia-2a-r2,
author = {{DiscoverIA}},
title = {Erdős problem #1105: full solution found in the literature, with some wrong references noted by the wiki (Aletheia)},
howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry erdos-1105-aletheia-2a},
note = {Status « Contested », snapshot 2, recorded on October 12, 2026. literature search},
year = {2026},
url = {https://discoveria.ai/en/fiche/erdos-1105-aletheia-2a/#releve-2},
urldate = {2026-10-12}
}Dated link opens this snapshot in the history
Text produced by an automatic template (DiscoverIA pipeline), on Reviewed by: nobody yetReport an error
What has not been reviewed?
The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
Key facts
- Claimed by
- Aletheia, selon le wiki IA d'Erdős
announced on Feb 1, 2026 - Nature
- literature search
- Field
- Mathematics (Erdős problem #1105 (graph theory ; ramsey theory))
- Wiki category
- Literature search (contribution secondaire : recherche bibliographique)
- Wiki verdict
- « Full solution found; Gave some wrong references » : 🟢 résolution complète (légende du wiki) ; travail incorrect (légende du wiki)
- According to erdosproblems.com
- problem proved (recorded on Oct 12, 2026)
- Checked by
- no verifier identified
- Sources (domains)
- 2 : 1 read word for word, 1 links only
- This entry
- AI draft, not reviewed
For experts
Sources(domains)
- primairegithub.compage read word for word · consulted on Oct 12, 2026
- listeerdosproblems.comlink only, reading not recorded
Method
Status “contested” recorded on 12 October 2026 from github.com (page read, quotation checked word for word). History: 2 dated observations, oldest first.
Limits
The status may change if a new source is published; the dated history stays visible.
In the same set
AI contributions to Erdős problems (wiki by T. Tao, frozen on 30 June 2026) · entry 470 of 521, by problem number
- Not evaluated : Erdős problem #1099: full solution found in the literature according to the wiki (ChatGPT Deep research, Gemini, Gemini Deep Research)
- Not evaluated : Erdős problem #1101: candidate partial result, second part solved, according to the wiki (GPT-5.5 Pro)
- Not evaluated : Erdős n°1102 : formalisation par Aristotle (preuve : van Doorn and Tao (2025))
- Contested : Erdős problem #1105: full solution found in the literature, with some wrong references noted by the wiki (Aletheia)
- Not evaluated : Erdős problem #1105: partial results found in the literature according to the wiki (ChatGPT Deep research)
- Not evaluated : Erdős n°1121 : formalisation par Aristotle (preuve : Goodman and Goodman (1945))
- Not evaluated : Erdős problem #1123: full solution found in the literature according to the wiki (Gemini Deep Research)
Status history
The numbers link the band (order of observations) and the thread (most recent first). Band segments have equal widths, not a time scale.
- 02
Not evaluatedbecomesContestedCurrent status
reclassified from not evaluated to contested based on the wiki's text
Source: github.comread word for word
An observation is added; none is ever erased.
Report an error or suggest a source
Thank you, your message was sent.
Sending failed. Try again, or write to [email protected].