Erdős n°751 : formalisation par GPT-5.2-Codex, GPT-5.2 Thinking (preuve : Bondy and Vince (1998))
French title, not yet translated
Status
Not evaluated
Recorded on · github.com
- Announced
- Wiki frozen
- Recordednot evaluated
- nextTo follow
What this status means
Source reading : Source read word for word (level 3 of 3)
No DiscoverIA status yet; this does not mean nobody has checked it.
To move to “Under review”: a public review under way. To “Peer reviewed”: a journal publication or a review by named experts.
Dated archive: status recorded on the wiki frozen on Jun 30, 2026
The gist
The “AI contributions to Erdős problems” wiki, frozen on 30 June 2026, lists an AI contribution by GPT-5.2-Codex, GPT-5.2 Thinking to Erdős problem #751 as “Formalization”.
Cite this entry
A single status snapshot since Oct 12, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot.
Cite snapshot 1, Oct 12, 2026
APA citation with the dated link
BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-erdos-751-gpt-5-2-codex-gpt-5-2-thinking-2b-r1
@misc{discoveria-erdos-751-gpt-5-2-codex-gpt-5-2-thinking-2b-r1,
author = {{DiscoverIA}},
title = {Erdős n°751 : formalisation par GPT-5.2-Codex, GPT-5.2 Thinking (preuve : Bondy and Vince (1998))},
howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry erdos-751-gpt-5-2-codex-gpt-5-2-thinking-2b},
note = {Status « Not evaluated », snapshot 1, recorded on October 12, 2026. formalisation of a known result},
year = {2026},
url = {https://discoveria.ai/en/fiche/erdos-751-gpt-5-2-codex-gpt-5-2-thinking-2b/#releve-1},
urldate = {2026-10-12}
}Dated link opens this snapshot in the history
Text produced by an automatic template (DiscoverIA pipeline), on Reviewed by: nobody yetReport an error
What has not been reviewed?
The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
Key facts
- Claimed by
- GPT-5.2-Codex, GPT-5.2 Thinking, selon le wiki IA d'Erdős
announced on Jan 27, 2026 - Nature
- formalisation of a known result
- Field
- Mathematics (Erdős problem #751 (graph theory ; chromatic number))
- Wiki category
- Formalization (contribution secondaire : formalisation)
- Proof formalised
- Bondy and Vince's
- According to erdosproblems.com
- problem: disproved, proof formalised in Lean (recorded on Oct 12, 2026)
- Checked by
- no verifier identified
- Sources (domains)
- 2 : 1 read word for word, 1 links only
- This entry
- AI draft, not reviewed
For experts
Sources(domains)
- primairegithub.compage read word for word · consulted on Oct 12, 2026
- listeerdosproblems.comlink only, reading not recorded
Method
Status “not evaluated” recorded on 12 October 2026 from github.com (page read, quotation checked word for word).
Limits
Nature: formalisation, that is a machine check of an already known result, not a discovery. DiscoverIA has recorded no independent evaluation as of this date.
In the same set
AI contributions to Erdős problems (wiki by T. Tao, frozen on 30 June 2026) · entry 304 of 521, by problem number
- Not evaluated : Erdős n°750 : formalisation par Claude Code, Claude Opus 4.7, GPT-5.5 Pro (preuve : Chojecki and GPT-5.5 Pro (2026))
- Not evaluated : Erdős problem #750: partial results found in the literature according to the wiki (GPT-5)
- Not evaluated : Erdős problem #750: full solution according to the wiki (GPT-5.5 Pro)
- Not evaluated : Erdős n°751 : formalisation par GPT-5.2-Codex, GPT-5.2 Thinking (preuve : Bondy and Vince (1998))
- Not evaluated : Erdős n°753 : formalisation par Aristotle (preuve : Alon (1992))
- Not evaluated : Erdős n°756 : formalisation par Aristotle (preuve : Bhowmick (2024))
- Not evaluated : Erdős n°760 : formalisation par Aristotle (preuve : Alon, Krivelevich, and Sudakov (1997))
Status history
Only one observation so far.
An observation is added; none is ever erased.
Report an error or suggest a source
Thank you, your message was sent.
Sending failed. Try again, or write to [email protected].