Erdős problem #846: two full solutions, one with a Lean proof, according to the wiki (DeepMind prover agent; OpenAI internal model (independently))
Status
Not evaluated
Recorded on · github.com
- Announced
- Wiki frozen
- Recordednot evaluated
- nextTo follow
What this status means
Source reading : Source read word for word (level 3 of 3)
No DiscoverIA status yet; this does not mean nobody has checked it.
To move to “Under review”: a public review under way. To “Peer reviewed”: a journal publication or a review by named experts.
Dated archive: status recorded on the wiki frozen on Jun 30, 2026
The gist
The “AI contributions to Erdős problems” wiki, frozen on 30 June 2026, lists an AI contribution to Erdős problem #846 as “Full solution (Lean); Full solution”.
Cite this entry
A single status snapshot since Oct 12, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot.
Cite snapshot 1, Oct 12, 2026
APA citation with the dated link
BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-erdos-846-deepmind-prover-agent-openai-internal-model-1b-r1
@misc{discoveria-erdos-846-deepmind-prover-agent-openai-internal-model-1b-r1,
author = {{DiscoverIA}},
title = {Erdős problem #846: two full solutions, one with a Lean proof, according to the wiki (DeepMind prover agent; OpenAI internal model (independently))},
howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry erdos-846-deepmind-prover-agent-openai-internal-model-1b},
note = {Status « Not evaluated », snapshot 1, recorded on October 12, 2026. new result},
year = {2026},
url = {https://discoveria.ai/en/fiche/erdos-846-deepmind-prover-agent-openai-internal-model-1b/#releve-1},
urldate = {2026-10-12}
}Dated link opens this snapshot in the history
Text produced by an automatic template (DiscoverIA pipeline), on Reviewed by: nobody yetReport an error
What has not been reviewed?
The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
Key facts
- Claimed by
- DeepMind prover agent; OpenAI internal model (independently), selon le wiki IA d'Erdős
announced on Feb 21, 2026 - Nature
- new result
- Field
- Mathematics (Erdős problem #846 (geometry))
- Wiki category
- AI alongside literature (IA parallèle à la littérature (comparable découverte après coup)
- Wiki verdict
- « Full solution (Lean); Full solution » : 🟢 résolution complète (légende du wiki)
- According to erdosproblems.com
- problem: disproved, proof formalised in Lean (recorded on Oct 12, 2026)
- Checked by
- no verifier identified
- Sources (domains)
- 2 : 1 read word for word, 1 links only
- This entry
- AI draft, not reviewed
For experts
Sources(domains)
- primairegithub.compage read word for word · consulted on Oct 12, 2026
- listeerdosproblems.comlink only, reading not recorded
Method
Status “not evaluated” recorded on 12 October 2026 from github.com (page read, quotation checked word for word).
Limits
A Lean proof supplied by the claimant does not count as formal verification by a third party. DiscoverIA has recorded no independent evaluation as of this date.
In the same set
AI contributions to Erdős problems (wiki by T. Tao, frozen on 30 June 2026) · entry 331 of 521, by problem number
- Not evaluated : Erdős problem #836: candidate partial result, second part solved, according to the wiki (GPT-5.5 Pro)
- Not evaluated : Erdős n°844 : formalisation par Aristotle (preuve : Chvátal (1974) + Weisenberg)
- Not evaluated : Erdős n°845 : formalisation par Aristotle (preuve : van Doorn and Everts (2025))
- Not evaluated : Erdős problem #846: two full solutions, one with a Lean proof, according to the wiki (DeepMind prover agent; OpenAI internal model (independently))
- Not evaluated : Erdős problem #847: full solution found in the literature according to the wiki (GPT-5.2 Pro)
- Not evaluated : Erdős n°848 : formalisation par Aristotle, Claude, GPT-5.2 (preuve : Sawhney (2025))
- Withdrawn : Erdős problem #848: proof judged incorrect by the wiki (Claude Opus 4.6, GPT-5.4)
Status history
Only one observation so far.
An observation is added; none is ever erased.
Report an error or suggest a source
Thank you, your message was sent.
Sending failed. Try again, or write to [email protected].