Erdős #90 also listed as solved by Claude Mythos
Status
Not evaluated
Recorded on · github.com
- Announced
- Recordednot evaluated
- nextTo follow
What this status means
Source reading : Source read through an AI summary (level 2 of 3)
No DiscoverIA status yet; this does not mean nobody has checked it.
To move to “Under review”: a public review under way. To “Peer reviewed”: a journal publication or a review by named experts.
The gist
The wiki of AI contributions to Erdős problems lists a full resolution of problem #90 by Claude Mythos (Anthropic), dated 26 May 2026. Status not yet evaluated.
Cite this entry
A single status snapshot since Oct 11, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot.
Cite snapshot 1, Oct 11, 2026
APA citation with the dated link
BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-erdos-90-claude-mythos-r1
@misc{discoveria-erdos-90-claude-mythos-r1,
author = {{DiscoverIA}},
title = {Erdős #90 also listed as solved by Claude Mythos},
howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry erdos-90-claude-mythos},
note = {Status « Not evaluated », snapshot 1, recorded on October 11, 2026. new result},
year = {2026},
url = {https://discoveria.ai/en/fiche/erdos-90-claude-mythos/#releve-1},
urldate = {2026-10-11}
}Dated link opens this snapshot in the history
Text written by an AI (DiscoverIA pipeline), on Reviewed by: nobody yetReport an error
What has not been reviewed?
The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
Key facts
- Claimed by
- Anthropic (Claude Mythos), selon le wiki IA d'Erdős
announced on May 26, 2026 - Nature
- new result
- Field
- Mathematics (discrete geometry)
- Checked by
- no verifier identified
- Sources (domains)
- 1 : 1 links only
- This entry
- AI draft, not reviewed
To understand
Analogy
It is like a line on a public notice board saying a puzzle has been solved: the line says who, but it is not the proof itself.
What it changes
If this resolution holds, an Anthropic model would have handled a discrete geometry question posed by Erdős. For now it is mainly an entry in a public record, not a checked result.
What remains unclear
The evidence cited is the wiki entry (status “full resolution”) and no verifier is named. The detail of the line was only read through a page-reading tool, and the record does not say exactly what the resolution establishes.
1 source.
For experts
Sources(domains)
- primairegithub.comlink only, reading not recorded
Method
Status “not evaluated” recorded on 11 October 2026 from github.com (page read through a model summary, quotation not rechecked).
Limits
The status source was read through a model summary; its quotation was not rechecked. DiscoverIA has recorded no independent evaluation as of this date.
It is like a line on a public notice board saying a puzzle has been solved: the line says who, but it is not the proof itself.
Status history
Only one observation so far.
An observation is added; none is ever erased.
Report an error or suggest a source
Thank you, your message was sent.
Sending failed. Try again, or write to [email protected].