Skip to content
FR · Français
Get started
Registry

OEIS Open: general LLMs solve 147 of 492 Lean-formalised OEIS conjectures

Status

Not evaluated

Recorded on · arxiv.org

  1. Announced
  2. Recordednot evaluated
  3. nextTo follow
What this status means

Source reading : Source read word for word (level 3 of 3)

No DiscoverIA status yet; this does not mean nobody has checked it.

To move to “Under review”: a public review under way. To “Peer reviewed”: a journal publication or a review by named experts.

Full history

The gist

Adamczewski and co-authors (arXiv 2608.11941, 2026-08) report that general language models solve 147 of 492 OEIS conjectures formalised in Lean, about 30%. Status: not yet evaluated.

FollowReport

Cite this entry

A single status snapshot since Oct 11, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot.

Cite snapshot 1, Oct 11, 2026

APA citation with the dated link

DiscoverIA. (2026, October 11,). OEIS Open: general LLMs solve 147 of 492 Lean-formalised OEIS conjectures [Status : Not evaluated, snapshot 1]. DiscoverIA registry. https://discoveria.ai/en/fiche/oeis-open-benchmark/#releve-1

BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-oeis-open-benchmark-r1

@misc{discoveria-oeis-open-benchmark-r1,
  author       = {{DiscoverIA}},
  title        = {OEIS Open: general LLMs solve 147 of 492 Lean-formalised OEIS conjectures},
  howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry oeis-open-benchmark},
  note         = {Status « Not evaluated », snapshot 1, recorded on October 11, 2026. benchmark},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://discoveria.ai/en/fiche/oeis-open-benchmark/#releve-1},
  urldate      = {2026-10-11}
}

Dated link opens this snapshot in the history

https://discoveria.ai/en/fiche/oeis-open-benchmark/#releve-1

Text written by an AI (DiscoverIA pipeline), on Reviewed by: nobody yetReport an error

What has not been reviewed?

The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.

The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.

Key facts

Claimed by
Adamczewski et al. (arXiv 2608.11941)
announced on Aug 2026
Nature
benchmark
Field
Mathematics (mathematics / benchmark)
Checked by
authors
Sources (domains)
1 : 1 links only
This entry
AI draft, not reviewed

To understand

Analogy

It is like a common exam: several models sit the same series of tests and one counts how many each passes.

What it changes

An open benchmark provides a shared measure for comparing models on conjectures about number sequences, checked by Lean. If the figures held, about 30% of these conjectures would already be within reach of general-purpose models.

What remains unclear

The results are checked by the authors themselves, with no named third party. They depend on a per-attempt compute budget that this entry does not detail. The date is known only to the month.

For experts

1 source.

For experts

Proofs
code d'évaluation open source, Lean

Sources(domains)

  • primairearxiv.orglink only, reading not recorded

Method

Status “not evaluated” recorded on 11 October 2026 from arxiv.org (page read, quotation checked word for word).

Limits

A Lean proof supplied by the claimant does not count as formal verification by a third party. DiscoverIA has recorded no independent evaluation as of this date.

To understand

It is like a common exam: several models sit the same series of tests and one counts how many each passes.

Status history

Only one observation so far.

  1. 01

    First observation:Not evaluatedCurrent status

    Source: arxiv.orgread word for word

An observation is added; none is ever erased.

Report an error or suggest a source

How DiscoverIA uses your address and how to exercise your rights: privacy policy.

Bot check not configured.