Skip to content
FR · Français
Get started

Not all have accompanying Lean formalizations.

Status

Not evaluated

Recorded on · github.com

  1. Announced
  2. Recordednot evaluated
  3. nextTo follow
What this status means

Source reading : Source read word for word (level 3 of 3)

No DiscoverIA status yet; this does not mean nobody has checked it.

To move to “Under review”: a public review under way. To “Peer reviewed”: a journal publication or a review by named experts.

Full history

The gist

Result from OpenAI's openai/math release of 6 October 2026, in mathematics, with no Lean proof and no third-party check.

FollowReport

Cite this entry

A single status snapshot since Oct 12, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot.

Cite snapshot 1, Oct 12, 2026

APA citation with the dated link

DiscoverIA. (2026, October 12,). Not all have accompanying Lean formalizations. [Status : Not evaluated, snapshot 1]. DiscoverIA registry. https://discoveria.ai/en/fiche/oai-fam-285-counterexamples-baumconnes-kadisonkaplansky/#releve-1

BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-oai-fam-285-counterexamples-baumconnes-kadisonkaplansky-r1

@misc{discoveria-oai-fam-285-counterexamples-baumconnes-kadisonkaplansky-r1,
  author       = {{DiscoverIA}},
  title        = {Not all have accompanying Lean formalizations.},
  howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry oai-fam-285-counterexamples-baumconnes-kadisonkaplansky},
  note         = {Status « Not evaluated », snapshot 1, recorded on October 12, 2026. new result},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://discoveria.ai/en/fiche/oai-fam-285-counterexamples-baumconnes-kadisonkaplansky/#releve-1},
  urldate      = {2026-10-12}
}

Dated link opens this snapshot in the history

https://discoveria.ai/en/fiche/oai-fam-285-counterexamples-baumconnes-kadisonkaplansky/#releve-1

Text produced by an automatic template (DiscoverIA pipeline), on Reviewed by: nobody yetReport an error

What has not been reviewed?

The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.

The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.

Key facts

Claimed by
OpenAI (modèle interne non diffusé)
announced on Oct 6, 2026
Nature
new result
Field
Mathematics (Operator algebras)
In openai/math
family 285, section “Operator algebras”, 3 manuscripts dated Sep 23, 2026
Lean proof
none supplied
Revisions
none reported by the claimant
Checked by
no verifier identified
Sources (domains)
4 : 4 links only
This entry
AI draft, not reviewed

For experts

Proofs
manuscrit : A torsion-free counterexample to reduced Baum–Connes injectivity (preprints/A-Torsion-Free-Counterexample-to-Reduced-Baum-Connes-Injectivity-September-23-2026), manuscrit : A torsion-free counterexample to the Kadison–Kaplansky projection conjecture (preprints/A-Torsion-Free-Counterexample-to-the-Kadison-Kaplansky-Projection-Conjecture-September-23-2026), manuscrit : An irrational-trace counterexample to reduced Baum–Connes (preprints/An-Irrational-Trace-Counterexample-to-Reduced-Baum-Connes-September-23-2026), aucun Lean fourni (pas de lean/docs/285.md)

Sources(domains)

Method

Status “not evaluated” recorded on 12 October 2026 from github.com (page read, quotation checked word for word).

Limits

DiscoverIA has recorded no independent evaluation as of this date.

In the same set

openai/math: 719 manuscripts in 372 families from an unreleased internal model · entry 279 of 372, by family number

See all 372 entries

Status history

Only one observation so far.

  1. 01

    First observation:Not evaluatedCurrent status

    Family with no Lean proof supplied. No third-party evaluation read.

    Source: github.comread word for word

An observation is added; none is ever erased.

Report an error or suggest a source

How DiscoverIA uses your address and how to exercise your rights: privacy policy.

Bot check not configured.