Skip to content
FR · Français
Get started

Kissing number in dimension 18

8358≤ value ≤16,406lower boundupper bound
10,00015,000198020002020updated on Oct 12, 2026Lower bound 7398, 1967, John Leech, publishedLower bound 7654, Nov 7, 2024, Henry Cohn and Anqi Li, publishedLower bound 8358, Sep 16, 2026, Alexander Kravatskiy, published8358Upper bound 16,406, Feb 24, 2022, David de Laat and Nando Leijenhorst, published16,406lowerupper10,00015,000198020002020updated on Oct 12, 2026Lower bound 7398, 1967, John Leech, publishedLower bound 7654, Nov 7, 2024, Henry Cohn and Anqi Li, publishedLower bound 8358, Sep 16, 2026, Alexander Kravatskiy, published8358Upper bound 16,406, Feb 24, 2022, David de Laat and Nando Leijenhorst, published16,406lower boundupper bound
Hover over the points or move through them with the keyboard; a click opens the PR, the commit or the source page.Tap a point to read its source; tap it again to open the PR or the page.
  1. upper bound 16,406by David de Laat and Nando Leijenhorstarxiv.org
  2. lower bound 7654by Henry Cohn and Anqi Liarxiv.org
  3. lower bound 8358by Alexander Kravatskiygithub.com
  4. Last checked
Lower bound · published · Sep 16, 2026
Exact value : 8358
Kravatskiy : 8358 en dimension 18 (hexagone de cosets « bent » sur le réseau de Barnes-Wall impair) · github.com
by Alexander Kravatskiy
FollowReport

Cite this frontier

DiscoverIA. Kissing number in dimension 18 [Frontier, checked on Oct 12, 2026]. DiscoverIA registry. https://discoveria.ai/en/frontieres/kissing-d18/

The exact value lies somewhere in between, within a factor of ×1.96. The lower bound has moved 2 times since 1967, most recently on Sep 16, 2026. The upper bound has not moved since 2022.

The maximum number of unit spheres with disjoint interiors that can touch a central unit sphere in R^18. A valid configuration of N spheres gives the lower bound N; a linear or semidefinite programming bound gives an upper bound.

Exact value unknown: gap 8358 versus 16406 (ratio 1.963 on Cohn's table consulted 2026-10-13). Lower bounds are explicit constructions (the recent ones announce an exact-arithmetic program check); no named third-party review appears in the sources read. The sources read declare AI use for these lower bounds: Claude Code (8358, 2026-09-16). The latest (8358, Alexander Kravatskiy, 2026-09-16) has AI use declared by its source. The upper bound (16406) is a semidefinite programming bound (Cohn's table, credited to Leijenhorst-de Laat); no source read attributes it to an AI.

Every step, as a table : Lower bound (3 points)

Best known configuration (constructions), from the Leech, Kallal-Kan-Wang or Cohn-Li records to the AI-assisted constructions of 2025-2026.

Points : Lower bound
DateExact valueNatureAuthorsSource
Sep 16, 20268358 Current recordpublishedAlexander Kravatskiygithub.com
Nov 7, 20247654 Current recordpublishedHenry Cohn, Anqi Liarxiv.org
19677398 Current recordpublishedJohn Leechdoi.org
Every step, as a table : Upper bound (1 points)

Best known upper bound (three-point semidefinite programming).

Points : Upper bound
DateExact valueNatureAuthorsSource
Feb 24, 202216406 Current recordpublishedDavid de Laat, Nando Leijenhorstarxiv.org
Kissing number (21)

Report an error or suggest a source

How DiscoverIA uses your address and how to exercise your rights: privacy policy.

Bot check not configured.