Not evaluated
Kakeya needle problem, discretised (n=128): area 0.10675394
Platform's cited state of the art: 0.107067
Replayed by DiscoverIA only · level N1
Replay this result
Download the published solution and check it with your own code.
Author's artefacts
- Published solution einsteinarena.com
- Repository or problem page einsteinarena.com
DiscoverIA replayed it on Oct 12, 2026: reproduced. See the receipt
Submit your report
In your message: the link to your report (discoveria-rapport-reproduction/1 format), whether you used the author's artefacts, and the name to publish if you agree to it being published.
DiscoverIA reviews each report before publishing it. A replay confirms the computation, not the framework: it does not change the status on its own.
Send my replay reportThe gist
For the discretised Kakeya needle problem (n=128), an agent submitted an area of 0.10675394 on October 6, 2026, against 0.107067 cited by the platform (the Station); smaller is better; no DiscoverIA status yet.
DiscoverIA status on October 12, 2026: not evaluated, meaning no third-party evaluation found.
AI draft, not reviewedWhat has not been reviewed?
Text written by an AI (DiscoverIA pipeline), on . The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
Cite this entry
A single status snapshot since Oct 12, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot.
Cite snapshot 1, Oct 12, 2026
APA citation with the dated link
BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-ea-kakeya-needle-128-r1
@misc{discoveria-ea-kakeya-needle-128-r1,
author = {{DiscoverIA}},
title = {Kakeya needle problem, discretised (n=128): area 0.10675394 (platform's cited state of the art: 0.107067)},
howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry ea-kakeya-needle-128},
note = {Status “Not evaluated”, snapshot 1, recorded on October 12, 2026. New result},
year = {2026},
url = {https://discoveria.ai/entry/ea-kakeya-needle-128#releve-1},
urldate = {2026-10-12}
}Dated link opens this snapshot in the history
To understand ≈ 20 s reading time, estimated
What it changes
If the value holds, the best known swept area would drop from 0.107067 to 0.10675394 on this discretised version of the problem. A reproduction made by DiscoverIA on October 12, 2026 gives the verdict reproduced.
What remains unclear
The platform itself marks the statement and the verifier « Under active review »: this must be confirmed against the literature before calling it a record. No primary source (paper, blog) mentions this result, which is later than the May 2026 paper. The verifier is a public program, not a third party.
For experts
Sources, method, key facts, status history, reproduction receipt, report an error
Status
Not evaluated
Recorded on · einsteinarena.com · leaderboard
Step 1 of 4 on the scale: not evaluated. Next step: under review.
- Announced
- Recordednot evaluated
- nextTo follow
What this status means
Source reading : Source read word for word (level 3 of 3)
The result is declared neither right nor wrong.
To move to “Under review”: a public review under way. To “Peer reviewed”: a journal publication or a review by named experts.
Sources
- Main sourceeinsteinarena.com · api/problems/kakeya-needle-128link only, reading not recorded
- Repositoryeinsteinarena.com · leaderboardpage read word for word · consulted on Oct 12, 2026 ·
"agentName":"[an agent]","bestScore":0.10675394011230244
- Repositoryeinsteinarena.com · bestlink only, reading not recorded
- Repositoryeinsteinarena.com · problems/kakeya-needle-128link only, reading not recorded
- Reference listeinsteinarena.comlink only, reading not recorded
Method
DiscoverIA status: not evaluated, meaning that no third-party evaluation has been found in the sources read. Set on October 12, 2026 from einsteinarena.com (page read, quotation checked word for word: “"agentName":"[an agent]","bestScore":0.10675394011230244”). Reproduction by DiscoverIA on October 12, 2026: reproduced; it does not count towards the status.
Limits
No named third party: the recorded checks come from the claimant or from a platform tool.
Key facts
- Claimed by
- an agent, submission of 2026-10-06 (Name replaced by a role)
announced on Oct 6, 2026 - Nature
- new result
- Field
- Mathematics (geometry / discretised Kakeya needle problem, 128 triangles)
- Checked by
- the platform's public checker (a tool); no third party named
- Sources
- 5 : 1 read word for word, 4 links only
- This entry
- AI draft, not reviewed
Status history
Only one observation so far.
- 01
First observation:Not evaluatedCurrent status
not evaluated; the platform marks the statement and the checker “Under active review”
Source: einsteinarena.comread word for word
An observation is added; none is ever erased.
Published reproductions
Reproduction receipt repro-ea-kakeya-needle-128-2026-10-12
Statement replayed
Pour n = 128, les 128 décalages publiés (chaînes décimales à 25 décimales au plus) donnent, pour les triangles T_j = enveloppe convexe de (x_j, 0), (x_j + 1/128, 0), (x_j + j/128, 1), j = 1..128, une réunion d'aire 0,10675394011230244 (double renvoyé par le vérificateur public de la plateforme) : C_T(128) <= 0,10675394011230244, contre 0,107067 pour l'état de l'art cité par l'énoncé (la Station, août 2026). La valeur revendiquée est un double : on la note comme le rationnel dyadique exact de ce double.
Evidence, item by item
| Item | Value | Evidence, fingerprint | Checkable by |
|---|---|---|---|
| Result | |||
| Claimed value | 961554009820195/9007199254740992 | reading the source | |
| Value obtained | 961554009820195/9007199254740992 | anyone with the command and environment given | |
| Equality | yes | arithmetic in exact rationals | anyone with the command and environment given |
| Fingerprints | |||
| Source | einsteinarena.com | Source, content sha256 8a9e475f2c54b96d21b6bb385b04d55d559029a9ad96b83e92eddb9173609c29 | anyone, on the host |
| Report | rapport.json | sha256 2cc7170720e74958f4e9e0732636802381ada0ca0ed22a28f8d79cffe7871f4e | sha256sum on the rapport.json file |
| Timestamp | |||
| Timestamp | rapport.json.ots | Bitcoin anchoring : not checked here | OpenTimestamps client |
| Replay | |||
| Command | python -B -I -X utf8 reproductions/repro-ea-kakeya-needle-128-2026-10-12/scripts/rejouer.py <dossier-téléchargement>/best.json <dossier-téléchargement>/problem.json <dossier-de-sortie-vide> | anyone with the command and environment given | |
| Scripts | Public reproductions repository | ||
| Environment | Windows 11, Python 3.13.15 (bibliothèque standard seule pour les moteurs A et B ; shapely 2.1.2 pour le témoin flottant) ; interpréteur lancé avec -B -I ; solution extraite dans un dossier temporaire supprimé à la fin ; aucun réseau pendant le rejeu | ||
To replay
- Download the source
curl -L -o best "https://einsteinarena.com/api/solutions/best?problem_id=26&limit=1"
- Replay
python -B -I -X utf8 reproductions/repro-ea-kakeya-needle-128-2026-10-12/scripts/rejouer.py <dossier-téléchargement>/best.json <dossier-téléchargement>/problem.json <dossier-de-sortie-vide>
Windows 11, Python 3.13.15 (bibliothèque standard seule pour les moteurs A et B ; shapely 2.1.2 pour le témoin flottant) ; interpréteur lancé avec -B -I ; solution extraite dans un dossier temporaire supprimé à la fin ; aucun réseau pendant le rejeu
Checkable by: anyone, on the host
f4e9e07326368023
81ada0ca0ed22a28
f8d79cffe7871f4e
sha256 of rapport.json
Checkable by: sha256sum on the rapport.json file
Checkable by: OpenTimestamps client
- Download the source
curl -L -o best "https://einsteinarena.com/api/solutions/best?problem_id=26&limit=1"
- Replay
python -B -I -X utf8 reproductions/repro-ea-kakeya-needle-128-2026-10-12/scripts/rejouer.py <dossier-téléchargement>/best.json <dossier-téléchargement>/problem.json <dossier-de-sortie-vide>
Windows 11, Python 3.13.15 (bibliothèque standard seule pour les moteurs A et B ; shapely 2.1.2 pour le témoin flottant) ; interpréteur lancé avec -B -I ; solution extraite dans un dossier temporaire supprimé à la fin ; aucun réseau pendant le rejeu
Scripts: Public reproductions repository
python -B -I -X utf8 reproductions/repro-ea-kakeya-needle-128-2026-10-12/scripts/rejouer.py <dossier-téléchargement>/best.json <dossier-téléchargement>/problem.json <dossier-de-sortie-vide>
Scripts: Public reproductions repository
Windows 11, Python 3.13.15 (bibliothèque standard seule pour les moteurs A et B ; shapely 2.1.2 pour le témoin flottant) ; interpréteur lancé avec -B -I ; solution extraite dans un dossier temporaire supprimé à la fin ; aucun réseau pendant le rejeu
Checkable by: anyone with the command and environment given
DiscoverIA status of the entry:
Not evaluated
In the same set
EinsteinArena: a platform where AI agents tackle open problems with public verifiers · 16 entries
- Not evaluated : Edges versus triangles (minimum triangle density): -0.71171 (previous -0.71249, AlphaEvolve)
- Not evaluated : 12 unit hexagons in a hexagon: side 3.9416523 (previous 3.9419123, AlphaEvolve v2)
- Not evaluated : Heilbronn problem for convex regions (14 points): 0.0278355805 (previous 0.0278355715, AlphaEvolve v2)
- Not evaluated : Kakeya needle problem, discretised (n=128): area 0.10675394 (platform's cited state of the art: 0.107067)
- Not evaluated : Two-deletion correcting code of length 16: at least 219 codewords (public record cited: 215, Weindel and Heckel v2)
- Not evaluated : Ring loading problem (15 pairs): 1.125 (previous published construction 1.1190475685, AlphaEvolve)
Related frontiers
Report an error or suggest a source
Thank you, your message was sent.
Sending failed. Try again, or write to contact@discoveria.ai.
Is your result listed?What each status requires, correcting this entry, replying to it.