Not evaluated
Two-deletion correcting code of length 16: at least 219 codewords
Public record cited: 215, Weindel and Heckel v2
Replayed by DiscoverIA only · level N1
Replay this result
Download the published solution and check it with your own code.
Author's artefacts
- Published solution einsteinarena.com
- Repository or problem page einsteinarena.com
DiscoverIA replayed it on Oct 12, 2026: reproduced. See the receipt
Submit your report
In your message: the link to your report (discoveria-rapport-reproduction/1 format), whether you used the author's artefacts, and the name to publish if you agree to it being published.
DiscoverIA reviews each report before publishing it. A replay confirms the computation, not the framework: it does not change the status on its own.
Send my replay reportThe gist
For a code correcting two deletions at length 16, an agent submitted 219 codewords on October 5, 2026, against 215 for Weindel and Heckel (version 2); larger is better; no DiscoverIA status yet.
DiscoverIA status on October 12, 2026: not evaluated, meaning no third-party evaluation found.
AI draft, not reviewedWhat has not been reviewed?
Text written by an AI (DiscoverIA pipeline), on . The status and its sources come from the registry; only the explanatory text has not been reviewed. A reported error is corrected, then the text is reviewed.
Cite this entry
A single status snapshot since Oct 12, 2026: a citation always points to a dated snapshot.
Cite snapshot 1, Oct 12, 2026
APA citation with the dated link
BibTeX @misc, key discoveria-ea-two-deletion-code-16-r1
@misc{discoveria-ea-two-deletion-code-16-r1,
author = {{DiscoverIA}},
title = {Two-deletion correcting code of length 16: at least 219 codewords (public record cited: 215, Weindel and Heckel v2)},
howpublished = {DiscoverIA registry, entry ea-two-deletion-code-16},
note = {Status “Not evaluated”, snapshot 1, recorded on October 12, 2026. New result},
year = {2026},
url = {https://discoveria.ai/entry/ea-two-deletion-code-16#releve-1},
urldate = {2026-10-12}
}Dated link opens this snapshot in the history
To understand ≈ 30 s reading time, estimated
What it changes
If the value holds, a code of 219 words would exceed by 4 words the public record cited by the platform (215, Weindel and Heckel, version 2 of June 2026, construction not published). The best reproducible code cited by the platform has 208 words (CPro1, May 2025). A reproduction made by DiscoverIA on October 12, 2026 gives the verdict reproduced.
What remains unclear
The platform marks the statement and the verifier « Under active review »: this must be confirmed against the literature before calling it a record. No primary source (paper, blog) mentions this result. The verifier is a public program, not a third party.
For experts
Sources, method, key facts, status history, reproduction receipt, report an error
Status
Not evaluated
Recorded on · einsteinarena.com · leaderboard
Step 1 of 4 on the scale: not evaluated. Next step: under review.
- Announced
- Recordednot evaluated
- nextTo follow
What this status means
Source reading : Source read word for word (level 3 of 3)
The result is declared neither right nor wrong.
To move to “Under review”: a public review under way. To “Peer reviewed”: a journal publication or a review by named experts.
Sources
- Main sourceeinsteinarena.com · api/problems/two-deletion-code-16link only, reading not recorded
- Repositoryeinsteinarena.com · leaderboardpage read word for word · consulted on Oct 12, 2026 ·
"agentName":"[an agent]","bestScore":219
- Repositoryeinsteinarena.com · bestlink only, reading not recorded
- Repositoryeinsteinarena.com · problems/two-deletion-code-16link only, reading not recorded
- Reference listeinsteinarena.comlink only, reading not recorded
Method
DiscoverIA status: not evaluated, meaning that no third-party evaluation has been found in the sources read. Set on October 12, 2026 from einsteinarena.com (page read, quotation checked word for word: “"agentName":"[an agent]","bestScore":219”). Reproduction by DiscoverIA on October 12, 2026: reproduced; it does not count towards the status.
Limits
No named third party: the recorded checks come from the claimant or from a platform tool.
Key facts
- Claimed by
- an agent (219 words, 2026-10-05); before it an agent (216 then 218 words, 2026-10-03) (Name replaced by a role)
announced on Oct 3, 2026 - Nature
- new result
- Field
- Theoretical computer science (coding theory / codes correcting two deletions (length 16))
- Checked by
- the platform's public checker (a tool); no third party named
- Sources
- 5 : 1 read word for word, 4 links only
- This entry
- AI draft, not reviewed
Status history
Only one observation so far.
- 01
First observation:Not evaluatedCurrent status
not evaluated; the platform marks the statement and the checker “Under active review”
Source: einsteinarena.comread word for word
An observation is added; none is ever erased.
Published reproductions
Reproduction receipt repro-ea-two-deletion-code-16-2026-10-12
Statement replayed
Il existe un code binaire de longueur 16 corrigeant deux suppressions, de 219 mots : 219 mots binaires de longueur 16, deux à deux distincts, tels que deux mots distincts n'aient aucun descendant commun, un descendant étant un mot de longueur 14 obtenu en supprimant deux positions. Soumission d'id 2605 d'un agent sur la plateforme EinsteinArena, évaluée le 2026-10-05 (score 219), contre 215 pour le record public cité par l'énoncé de la plateforme (Weindel et Heckel, v2).
Evidence, item by item
| Item | Value | Evidence, fingerprint | Checkable by |
|---|---|---|---|
| Result | |||
| Claimed value | 219 | reading the source | |
| Value obtained | 219 | anyone with the command and environment given | |
| Equality | yes | arithmetic in exact integers | anyone with the command and environment given |
| Fingerprints | |||
| Source | einsteinarena.com | Source, content sha256 8fece05aec4a8ed9f4aac3b7078ad4f82f6b7e66ef9b4adc214077e835bea218 | anyone, on the host |
| Report | rapport.json | sha256 2bf28293e5f177589a002d157d31f86b49044ab57decc4cc4d57c2794c98c3de | sha256sum on the rapport.json file |
| Timestamp | |||
| Timestamp | rapport.json.ots | Bitcoin anchoring : not checked here | OpenTimestamps client |
| Replay | |||
| Command | python -I -X utf8 reproductions/repro-ea-two-deletion-code-16-2026-10-12/scripts/rejouer.py <dossier-téléchargement>/solutions_best_problem34_limit4.json <dossier-téléchargement>/problem_two-deletion-code-16.json <dossier-de-sortie> | anyone with the command and environment given | |
| Scripts | Public reproductions repository | ||
| Environment | Windows 11, Python 3.13.15 (bibliothèque standard seule) ; interpréteur lancé avec -I (mode isolé) ; réponse de l'API téléchargée dans un dossier séparé du code ; aucun réseau pendant le rejeu | ||
To replay
- Download the source
curl -L -o best "https://einsteinarena.com/api/solutions/best?problem_id=34&limit=4"
- Replay
python -I -X utf8 reproductions/repro-ea-two-deletion-code-16-2026-10-12/scripts/rejouer.py <dossier-téléchargement>/solutions_best_problem34_limit4.json <dossier-téléchargement>/problem_two-deletion-code-16.json <dossier-de-sortie>
Windows 11, Python 3.13.15 (bibliothèque standard seule) ; interpréteur lancé avec -I (mode isolé) ; réponse de l'API téléchargée dans un dossier séparé du code ; aucun réseau pendant le rejeu
Checkable by: anyone, on the host
9a002d157d31f86b
49044ab57decc4cc
4d57c2794c98c3de
sha256 of rapport.json
Checkable by: sha256sum on the rapport.json file
Checkable by: OpenTimestamps client
- Download the source
curl -L -o best "https://einsteinarena.com/api/solutions/best?problem_id=34&limit=4"
- Replay
python -I -X utf8 reproductions/repro-ea-two-deletion-code-16-2026-10-12/scripts/rejouer.py <dossier-téléchargement>/solutions_best_problem34_limit4.json <dossier-téléchargement>/problem_two-deletion-code-16.json <dossier-de-sortie>
Windows 11, Python 3.13.15 (bibliothèque standard seule) ; interpréteur lancé avec -I (mode isolé) ; réponse de l'API téléchargée dans un dossier séparé du code ; aucun réseau pendant le rejeu
Scripts: Public reproductions repository
python -I -X utf8 reproductions/repro-ea-two-deletion-code-16-2026-10-12/scripts/rejouer.py <dossier-téléchargement>/solutions_best_problem34_limit4.json <dossier-téléchargement>/problem_two-deletion-code-16.json <dossier-de-sortie>
Scripts: Public reproductions repository
Windows 11, Python 3.13.15 (bibliothèque standard seule) ; interpréteur lancé avec -I (mode isolé) ; réponse de l'API téléchargée dans un dossier séparé du code ; aucun réseau pendant le rejeu
Checkable by: anyone with the command and environment given
DiscoverIA status of the entry:
Not evaluated
In the same set
EinsteinArena: a platform where AI agents tackle open problems with public verifiers · 16 entries
- Not evaluated : 12 unit hexagons in a hexagon: side 3.9416523 (previous 3.9419123, AlphaEvolve v2)
- Not evaluated : Heilbronn problem for convex regions (14 points): 0.0278355805 (previous 0.0278355715, AlphaEvolve v2)
- Not evaluated : Kakeya needle problem, discretised (n=128): area 0.10675394 (platform's cited state of the art: 0.107067)
- Not evaluated : Two-deletion correcting code of length 16: at least 219 codewords (public record cited: 215, Weindel and Heckel v2)
- Not evaluated : Ring loading problem (15 pairs): 1.125 (previous published construction 1.1190475685, AlphaEvolve)
Related frontiers
Report an error or suggest a source
Thank you, your message was sent.
Sending failed. Try again, or write to contact@discoveria.ai.
Is your result listed?What each status requires, correcting this entry, replying to it.